Skip Navigation

TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾

@ TherapyGary @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts
25
Comments
291
Joined
6 mo. ago

Being a bodyless head with a freak long tongue is not only okay—it can be an exciting opportunity

  • They conscript themselves unto a diminutive solace tenet that our noetic essence is not merely inscribed within our cerebral neurons but encompasses a resplendent effulgence that constructively/destructively commingles with the circumambient firmament upon some infinitesimal stratum we ascribe to capricious vicissitudes, and that upon our demise, we sunder solely the corporeal partition of our noetic essence whilst our effulgent essence endures, enscrolled within a vaster concatenation of ambient cogitation.

    Somewhat reminiscent of phantasms/an empyrean continuance, yet less plaintive wailing and clanking of fetters and more ethereal attunement to the affective emanation of a park bench amid the interlaced noetic filigrees that have ever impinged upon it.

    They might be in the wrong comm though...

  • issthty also I'm into star trek now apparently so thanks for that

  • Ohh, yep- I forgot about those ones! I've seen some like that around my area, but most here are on those skinny poles like shown in the thumbnail

  • If you can climb a rope, the poles that Flock use are narrow enough to be climbed the same way

  • Idk about paint, but flex seal works

  • Noticed you were banned. Feel free to respond via DM bc at this point I'm genuinely enthralled and excited to understand you. Going to sleep now tho jsyk

  • Rhetoric can be shallow aesthetics.

    It certainly can be, but it isn't when we're talking about dehumanizing groups of people.

    I could also talk about liking dogs or being shit at everything. Would that make me a nazi?

    What

    I think there are things, including being lost to fascism or cult liberalism, that make you subhuman.

    Please consider reflecting on this. It's fucking bananas.

    Really that rhetoric isnt perfect but perfect accuracy is a luxury not often available in public conversations. 'Not a person, but an object with all the frailties of biology and none of the ways its cool. I dont mean to disparage other species'.

    Do you think I'm calling you out on this because I'm vegan? Bc that has nothing to do with it. If that's not what you're getting at, I have no idea what you mean by this.

    You can take your magical bullshit shortcut thinkingThats fine, until it leads you to very unfortunate conclusions or cognitive dissonance.

    Is the conclusion / cognitive dissonance you're implying that you think I would hesitate to kill a fascist because I don't see them as subhuman? I don't need to dehumanize my enemies to be willing to fight them.

    To be clear, this is my best guess because the primary purpose of dehumanizing a group of people is to justify eliminating them.

    I assume you do it because somebody told you that was nice.

    You assume that I don't dehumanize people because someone said that not dehumanizing groups of people is nice? I avoid it because it's fascist behaviour

    I would rather be correct than nice. Its a value i have.

    What on earth does this have to do with being correct? Do you literally believe some groups of human are "less human" than others? I assumed you were at least speaking metaphorically

    And it often leads to doing nice things, but without the feeling of being fake as fuck.

    I'm having trouble following your train of thought. What are you implying?

  • Do you really believe that rhetoric is shallow aesthetics, and using Nazi rhetoric is fine if on the inside you're secretly not a Nazi?

    Or is your response just a good ole non sequitur

  • The Nazi rhetoric, if you couldn't make the connection, was you referring to people as "subhuman filth."

  • I'm mostly concerned with the Nazi rhetoric- the transphobia was just the cherry on top

  • I have had more productive conversations with a literal nazi

    subhuman filth

    Why do pronouns matter?... Fuck off with that shit.

    Holy smokes what an unsurprising arc

    Edit:

  • Edit: I'm mocking Lodespawn VieuxQueb tbc

  • Ah okay, I understand- we agree on this

    Tbc, I was just making a joke along the same lines as gen x being left out of the discourse between millennials and boomers

    But by representation in memes, I meant being directly called out in memes. I agree that the focus on "eat the rich" over "seize the means of production" can be bad, and overlooking the petty bourgeois can have problematic implications

    It was a bit of a tongue in cheek thing as well though bc I belong to the petty bourgeois (although I don't own capital or employ others)

  • Oh I recall that thread. Was it denial of interference though? Iirc, I read it as more so arguing Israel's influence was greater while Russia's influence was overblown to distract from that.

    More importantly, how does that argument (either one- my interpretation or yours) split the left?

    Edit: Ohhhh okay I see, because Russian influence included supporting Sanders and attacking Clinton?

  • By split the left, do you mean encouraging people not to vote for libs?

  • What?

  • I'm so sick of the lack of petit bourgeois representation in memes 😔

  • Hmm. I think maybe I have a fundamental misunderstanding of anarcho-antirealism? I'd suspect a large theoretical overlap between the former and illegalism, egoism, critical/anti-psychiatry, etc, but I'm surprised to see that we seem to have a fundamental difference of perspective here, on a narrow subject that manages to encapsulate all of the above

    Maybe it's my tankie bone telling me that those ASPD-identifying people don't know what's really in their own self interest. You respect their perspective as their reality (and demonstrate that by adopting it? or no?), whereas I would, at most, agree to disagree with those people. The latter, to me, feels antirealist, but I can see how this maybe isn't in the true spirit of anarcho-antirealism.

    I'm curious what You think about this

    (2 narcissists try to determine who's right: impossible edition)

  • To be clear, I absolutely agree that NPD is/has a real pathology, and is a disability. Under the hood, it's most often a trauma-related disorder of self-security. Like Trump, I only don't meet NPD criteria myself bc it doesn't impair my life

    I guess I'm mostly just surprised to see You taking ASPD at face value in the first place, unlike the critical way You approach NPD. I would expect that if one takes an anarcho-antirealist approach, the conclusion would be that the ASPD diagnosis doesn't serve the individual, but rather serves the state, and ought to be discarded. I worry that normalizing the ASPD label is likely to subvert the notion that smashing the state is good and that people should do so without remorse.

    I imagine, however, this difference in perspective comes down to a macro lens vs a micro lens. For an individual stuck with the diagnosis on their medical documentation, leaning into it and wielding it might be in their best interest. As their provider, however, I would encourage them not to identify with that label, and to let me write a rule out diagnosis for their file, removing the label from their documentation. Of course, if they disagreed, I would just pivot to trying to further foster the empowerment of it.

    If I met someone like You described, finding themself acting without thinking, regretting it, and wishing they could better mind social boundaries to improve their wellbeing, but without an existing ASPD diagnosis, I would likely explore other relevant diagnoses, like ADHD, ASD, BPD, etc.

  • guns @hexbear.net

    [Discussion] Belly band holsters?

  • The Shitpost Office @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Designing some shirts for myself and my partner vetoed this one

  • TransSpecies @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Seeking inclusive terms which can refer to any entity

  • askchapo @hexbear.net

    This response doesn't exactly inspire confidence... Thoughts?

  • The Shitpost Office @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Text from a comment by SeeMarkFly

  • Flippanarchy @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Did he really say this

  • Trippin' Bastards @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    16 people are having a nice conversation. A moderator says no. Locks whole post. Is this not absurd?

  • Trippin' Bastards @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Banned from YouShouldKnow for educating people about that pills aren't real

  • Lefty Memes @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Still looking for the right community for this meme

  • Flippanarchy @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Sunday school -> insurrectionary anarchy pipeline

  • Would You Rather @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    WYR have to pee out your ears, or fart through your nose?

  • The Shitpost Office @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    REMOVED FROM POLITICALMEMES SUBREDDIT BECAUSE THE MODS ARE SADDAM APOLOGISTS

  • The Shitpost Office @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Surely they knew

  • Mod Abuse Hotline @lemmy.sdf.org

    Banned from Politics@LW for sharing an article about misinformation and fake news

  • The Shitpost Office @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Thinking about getting a new printer- what do we think of this one?

  • The Shitpost Office @lemmy.dbzer0.com

    LPT: avoid learning Morse code for your own sanity

  • The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk @anarchist.nexus

    Libs don't even act in their own best interest, let alone the best interest of the working class as a whole

  • The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk @anarchist.nexus

    What's next- George Bush is actually on The Left™ too?

  • The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk @anarchist.nexus

    Lib thinks leftists must be MAGA in disguise for criticizing Dems

  • Flippanarchy @lemmy.dbzer0.com