Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K
Posts
1
Comments
179
Joined
9 mo. ago

  • In addition to what everyone's suggested, you can also add custom CSS for their jellyfin account to hide stuff they don't need access to.

  • There's a difference between interviewing someone and helping thrm share their message

  • Yes, source available is distinct from open source. Source available just means you can see the code. Open source allows you to modify and redistribute the code.

  • Yeah, you can. SteamOS is basically just a customized arch Linux. It's what runs on the steam deck, which you can install non-steam games on. They integrate really well into the console experience as well.

  • Its a massive companies, there's probably like 7 different orgs making android / pixel decisions that rarely interact and have little idea what the others are doing

  • I never understood what this damn distro is about. All I hear is "IT GOT DEFAULTS!" whenever I try to look it up.

    That's cause that's all it is lol, it's just arch bundled with some guys dotfiles

  • How?

    Jump
  • Noones going into your home and taking features away from you, they just decided they don't want to be putting a ton of effort into something 2 people care about.

    The beauty of FOSS is devs are free to make these decisions just like you're free to develop what you need.

  • I mean, at least they nailed the dystopian aesthetic

  • Consent require all parties to know the consequences to be fully informed

    Yes, that's what I said earlier:

    "Consent doesn't mean only doing things you're into, it means you're agreeing to it free from any pressure or influence on your decision and you know everything you need to know to make your decision."

    When I say I don't care what people do as long as there's consent, that's a requirement built into that statement. The vast vast majority of choking isn't consentual, that's the issue we need to address.

    There is no after care for brain damage. This is where the kink community needs to come together to put their foot down.

    This isn't a kink issue, it's a mainstream issue.the kink community takes consent and safety incredibly seriously. In this case that's stuff like roleplay choking or breathplay.

  • Okay this comment makes me think you don't understand consent.

    If it was SO consensual why are guys not getting choked equally?

    My partner has fetishes I'm not into, but I engage in them because I want to give him the pleasure he gets from them. Is that not consentual because I'm not into the fetish?

    Consent doesn't mean only doing things you're into, it means you're agreeing to it free from any pressure or influence on your decision and you know everything you need to know to make your decision.

    I won't be choked and I wouldn't choke someone because it is dangerous and I'm uncomfortable with it regardless of if the other person wants it. But as long as people consent and know the risks I don't care what others do.

    The answer is it isn't. It is about dominance and power not a consensual act.

    Dominance and power can absolutely be consentually engaged in. The bdsm community takes consent incredibly seriously.

    There are larger cultural elements behind what people are into that are worth examining. Cultural influence doesn't necessarily mean it isn't consentual though.

  • Sorry if I got off topic and triggered your misogyny.

    Glad you can recognize you changed the topic.

    Discussing issues of consent is valuable and important. Doing so because two adult's consentual acts make you uncomfortable is unhelpful and actively harmful because you're conflating consentual and non-consentual actions.

  • My primary concern in all this is safety. It is not safe to choke your parter even if it is agreed upon. It causes permanent damage although how much damage I suppose is debatable.

    tbh I don't care if people engage in dangerous actions as long as it's done with informed consent.

    There are major issues with people being pressured into putting up with stuff they wouldn't otberwise but that's a far bigger issue you don't solve by banning media.

  • You're replying to a thread that explicitly says it's being done consentually. This is a non-sequiter.

    You don't solve non-consentual actions by complaining about two people doing the same thing consentually.

  • go touch grass and stop victim blaming

  • Yes, and male birth control doesn't solve these problems because the only way to be 100% sure is to be on birth control yourself, especially important with huge chunks of the US banning abortions

  • Earlier trials saw the same thing a few percent tapping out for the same reasons.

    A fee percent is quite different from what you said earlier. Basically any trial has a few percent drop out.