√𝛂𝛋𝛆

@ j4k3 @piefed.world

Posts

81
Comments

553
Joined

8 mo. ago

Moderating

Public Commons piefed.world

2w ago

Have you found an actually practical use of or place in a workflow of yours using an LLM?
Jump
√𝛂𝛋𝛆 @piefed.world 2w ago
Reading with text to speech. I have a script I wrote with the open weights Silero a couple of years ago. There are better now, but it helps with big blocks of text.
Qwen coder models are better than stack exchange for code snippets. They are also good at OCR, formatting structured data, and such.
I like messing around with alignment as a puzzle game using the vocabulary and a bunch of scripts.
Qwen can do basic FreeCAD macros. It is also good at lisp with emacs as one would expect given the history of lisp.
I have a setup for chatting in various modes like friend, mentor, philosophy, and lewd. I have a conversational diffusion setup where the dialog is in the images. I also have a setup that started as a writing partner but ended up as my science fiction universe. It does not write much ahead of me. It is like sentence completion and writes in my voice. I use segmentation stuff with images. I can use it to break up objects in image layers far better than I can brute force in gimp. I've only run open weights models on my own hardware.

2w ago

I totally agree, too much is too much.

How insane the dichotomous stupidity. I am not at all saying "do not moderate".

"All actions are harmful" is a statement of empathy and far more nuances than you understand. Your lack of fundamental logic skills are sad.

What the OP posted is extremely flawed logic. There is nothing partisan about the death of Alex Pretti. Wanting to talk about his death is something bipartisan and any halfwit should be able to discern as much if they take the time to think things through. This post is showing mob populism and a lack of morals and ethics that are super dangerous and idiotic. The actions taken against the post were deeply flawed, and the hate here is bigoted tribalistic nonsense. This is turning into a worthless echo chamber and it is driving out people with intellectual balance and half decent logic skills. How pathetic.

It is an easily mistaken context dear neighbor, if one were to project my abstraction into some emotional space, but I assure you the assumption is patently false. For when I say such a society it is an abstraction against my perception, and principally grounded in the post about the man that died on an airplane. I am calling out the chasm of how the morals and ethics extrapolate, and conjuring a picture that illustrates my point. I lead off that illustration by clearly stating that my perspective is ungrounded and that it is impossible to do so from such a simple scope of a time and place. However, I'm also conjuring a circumstance that should garner empathy to counter other sentiments I see as grossly immoral.

Further, one should duly note that In have clearly stated I care about anyone and everyone, which obviously includes the wonderful people of India. I do not accept any assertion that some lives are merely acceptable collateral damage due to the population density or narcissistic adolescent halfwits that fail to project themselves onto the lives of others with empathy.

So it is quite the opposite of what you imagined. My indignation is against those that accept these poor people as worthless, if that happened to be the case, and the image was plain and straightforward. It does not matter whether my assumptions are correct in the trauma I felt when seeing that image. The moral and ethical implications of the abstraction extrapolate to the situation on the plane. If one dead body is irrelevant, than six are equally the same, and the end result is a complete breakdown of civilization into barbarism. That it is grounded in a kernel of reality, lends the illustrative tool the teeth needed to make the principal stick, however it is only an abstraction.