I suppose it's too early to tell, but I'm assuming all of the civitai models and loras remain incompatible unless they are similarly optimized, right?

Yeah, the story should have been, "Trump comes up with another distraction to avoid admitting he's violating the Constitution," or at least, "Trump too stupid to understand a picture and says stupid thing."

But none of this gets to the most jaw-dropping part of this. Musk and Thiel propose making this network of hundreds of surveillance and attack satellites into a subscription service that the Musk/Thiel/Luckey consortium would own and the Pentagon would subscribe to. Not only is this crazy and absurd but it goes without saying that in no normal time would anyone at the Pentagon be okay with the US not owning the hardware at the center of national defense. We’ve seen how this goes with Starlink, where Musk routinely threatens to turn the system on or off based on his whims and opens up separate lines of communications and perhaps deals with adversary leaders like Vladimir Putin.

Of course Musk and Thiel and Palmer freaking Luckey would use this opportunity to not only get apparent no-bid contracts to build this unworkable mess, they'd get permanent parasitic access to government funds just to keep it going.

No part of this makes any strategic sense.

That must have been very traumatic at a formative age. Have you gotten professional therapy?

OpenAI recently updated ChatGPT to be able to reproduce images in a specific style, and a lot of people posted Ghibli-style versions of things. So all of a sudden, it's a big deal.

Oh, that's definitely how it should be (but pretty much never is). That's good to hear.

Yes, for sure. While everyone else was in realpolitik mode, it seemed clear to me you don't start a negotiation with a bad faith opponent by ceding your strongest position.

Obama governed as a centrist, and while I agree he probably escaped unscathed without any long-term ill will because of it, he squandered a ton of opportunities. Oh, and we got Trump as a reaction to the GOP's boogeyman propaganda anyway.

The criticism is valid but antiquated. It was Romney's healthcare framework for Massachusetts, and Obama (in typical fashion) led with a compromise to attempt to avoid a fight with conservatives and conservative democrats. By agreeing to private insurance mandates and not even fighting for a viable public option, I agree that Obama really missed a once-in-a-generation opportunity.

The reason why it doesn't make sense now to level the criticism that it's a "Republican healthcare plan" is that we've shifted several Overton windows to the right since then. A "Republican healthcare plan" in 2025 is an uninsured ER visit, where they are allowed to turn you away; you die in the street, after which your surviving family is billed for the corpse cleanup.

The CFPB people he cut were saving citizens - i.e. the very taxpayers Musk claims to represent without a mandate of any kind - $21 billion already.

He was selling our dollars for pennies.

To call this a monumentally unimpressive number doesn’t do it justice. Musk’s “savings” here — which are already error-ridden and inflated in the first place, created by totaling up spending that never actually existed or that was, alternately, either already cut or never actually was — represent just 15% of the trillion dollars he originally promised he would slash.

7.5%. He promised $2 trillion in cuts.

Gotta hand it to them - they're constantly innovating how to be more evil and petty.

El Salvador is receiving $20,000 per year per prisoner.

From the letter:

The American Civil Liberties Union urges you to vote NO on H.R. 1526, the “No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025.” This bill would prohibit federal district courts from issuing injunctive relief that extends beyond the parties to a particular case. This means that federal district courts would no longer be allowed to issue nationwide injunctions when examining federal policies, even if those policies have a nationwide effect.

Text: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1526/text

Here I thought I was keeping up with the firehose, but this legislation is really insane. Only appellate courts could issue injunctions that apply beyond the parties and those represented by a party (e.g., class action).

This law would mean that every case is an individual determination. Every single wronged person would have to sue to enjoin a law that violates basic human rights.

This means that instead of Trump doing something blatantly illegal and unconstitutional and a court issuing an order immediately enjoining it, it may be months or years where he can act illegally before a higher court rules on it.

Yes, but they're just lawyers. If only they had applicable skills here that could help them challenge this in court.

The thing I like about Unraid that's dead simple, which I'm sure more technically-minded people can do with many solutions, is use drives of different sizes as long as each drive is less than the size of the parity drive(s). Since content shares are automatically distributed across drives, and those drives are different sizes, is that not very similar functionality?

I guess my question is, is the hybrid RAID solution above different only in that the array presents as a single drive to the user, rather than a single (multi-drive-apportioned) share?

Top Republicans in Congress are leaning hard on the tech giant to make its content policies friendlier to the GOP, after winning that fight with social media companies Meta and X.

Gather round, children, and hear tell of the legendary fight Meta and X put up against GOP-friendly policies.

You make it sound so broad. Really, it only works if they say the magic words "this is an official act," before, during or any time after what they are doing.

I can't say I understand the reasons for that.

But the flash drive content is very minimal and in 2+ years of using it, anecdotally I haven't had any problems. The cache drive is separate (I use an SSD for that in addition to my 3.5" HDDs), and once booted my understanding is the entire OS is in memory, so it isn't a bottleneck. The OS flash drive is small and just settings, and one-click backup, so I don't have anxiety over data loss.

Instead, the agreement, signed on March 7 by top DHS and Pentagon officials, says the departments agreed to use the Guantanamo base to detain migrants with final deportation orders who have "a nexus to a transnational criminal organization (TCO) or criminal drug activity."

Officials defined "nexus" in broad terms. A nexus can be satisfied, the memo says, if migrants with final deportation orders are part of a transnational criminal group or if they paid one "to be smuggled into the United States." The latter condition could be used to describe many of the migrants and asylum-seekers who have illegally crossed the U.S. southern border, as criminal groups in Mexico largely control the illicit movement of people and drugs there.

See, this is why I'm cynical about whether we can escape fascism. Because Trump is an idiot, a fascist yes but even that aspect ruled by his malignant narcissism. But he's surrounded by people who know exactly how to manipulate the system in bad faith, and have a remarkably efficient plan to normalize and legalize fascism.

"A nexus to a transnational criminal organization" sounds good enough that 95% of the public will shrug. But under this definition, does my Wells Fargo account mean I have a nexus with a transnational criminal organization? Similarly, I've paid them money, which no doubt in part went to their criminal fake account scheme. It's coherent to say that I am just as culpable through this absurd game of sophistry. Who isn't captured by this?

The definitions of crime are becoming intentionally malleable and debatable, misused with malice and cunning, and capture all of us. This moment is what it looks like to dismantle the rule of law. Eventually, a terminal case is 100% selective enforcement, but it will always be "legitimized" enough that a coherent case can be made either way.

It's hard not to see this common thread the last few months. Whether its migrants, or students, or federal workers receiving arbitrary judgment, the rule of law is the only consistent enemy.