Skip Navigation
Posts
4
Comments
27
Joined
3 yr. ago
  • I genuinely can't tell if this is a joke or not , but I really hope it is because its so perfect

  • comments are also broken in the same way:

    Coptic: ⲜⳃⲭⲕⲪⲚⲺⲝⲼⲮⲴⲝⲫⳂⲫⲼⳌⲵⳔ

  • test @lemmy.ml
    MinekPo1 @lemmy.ml

    testing interstellar encoding...

    Latin-1 suplement: ÆëÛÙ£µº

    Latin Extended-A: łŃńŤđĩı

    Latin Extended-B: ƮǜDžǥǡƪǾȫȵ

    Cyrlic: дЦВтѝоМЍтэНтэЦТъм

    Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics: ᑃᐍᑞᒣᓥᔓᕆᕻᕊᖮᗤᖺᘥᙋᘚᙳ᙮

  • fun fact : the angle is now around 3" 26' which is just slightly over ¹/₂₀ of a degree !

  • I use blueprints for junctions & those funny looking train buffers since I don't feel like measuring them out every time , though I find trains relatively intuitive . tbh might add more blueprints to my arsenal further down the road as I'm only at ~150 h

  • note that I use a mod called logistics train network to manage train routes , though I'm not sure if that's what you are referring to .

    actually one of the oopsies was caused by me misconfiguring a train stop and I had to deal with quite a few trains full of copper or iron blocking my main

  • Videos @lemmy.ml
    MinekPo1 @lemmy.ml

    Factorio timelapse: Even more base expansion

    took me a bit haha

    sorry for any jump cuts, I had to fix stuff around the base (incl. an almost blackout oops) and didn't want to add to the stress by trying to record it.

  • not exactly a DAW/VST but VCV Rack is a open source (though with a pro version , the pro version can work as a VST though I never used it in that way) eurorack modular synthesizer symulator if you want to experiment a bit

  • not entirely sure but this doesn't feel like something the fsf would like . most definetly it violates freedoms 0. because it discriminates against companies with over 5 M$ in income and against people living in Japan (see 2.14 , though I'm not sure its enough to qualify) , and possibly by restricting what you can do with the software , though I'm not sure on that one . it also violates freedoms 2. and 3. by requiring publicly releasing your changes (fsf requires that free software licenses allow for private modifications) and possibly by requiring contacting the licensor or the post-open administration though I'm unsure of if it does (entering into a post-open source zero-cost / paid contract seems to me to imply contacting either the licensor or the post-open administration) .

    further reading :

  • to my knowledge disabled apps do not run so you must have misunderstood something

  • if I understand correctly the rethink app does also work as a firewall , so no . I've also found netguard to be less intuitive and to have a less readable UI .

    if you are just using rethink as a DNS provider however then netguard (or the rethink app) can allow you to have more granular control over specific apps .

  • just gonna say , rethink combines both a firewall and a DNS blocker .

  • And give “the verge” some ad revenue?

    Wait you don't have an ad blocker ? (to be fair I use an adblocker which does pretend to watch and click ads thus giving the verge ad revenue)

  • I doubt it would affect Newpipe either honesty

  • No its microsofts database GUI program that's part of Microsoft Office . imagine software made for users who have a vague understanding of SQL and visual basic but then an exec. forced the designers and devs to make it accessible to everyone while giving them barely any teamembers causing a fuckton of technical debt and unintuitive quirks , making anyone who opens the software feel like they have just been placed in a highly equipped tank , in front of a wall of unlabeled levers and told to drive the tank , or at least that's how I view it.

    (reposting from another account sorry if you see both comments)

  • reading through your comments I feel like the issue is of interpretation : what I , and possibly others , assumed you were trying to say is that non native English speakers have an advantage when trying to interpret the meaning of words , so sorry about that .

    Thinking about it however , I believe I have been taught more about linguistics in my Polish lessons than in my English lessons . Unfortunately , as you have suspected many students will , I forgot a large portion of it , which I am especially unhappy about now that I am getting interested in recreational linguistics , I still remember some of it , with parts of speech (not to be confused with constituents (that joke would be quite a bit better in Polish as constituents literally means parts of (a) sentence in Polish)) being one of the most basic building blocks of language

  • ah I must have misunderstood your comment , I think you may have replied to a different comment than you have intended to ?

    also just as a side note , one counter example is many autistic people , myself included prefer the term autistic person rather than person with autism , though to be fair that is moreso an adjective but the way you worded that sentence suggests its also incorrect in some cases yeah um

    also I have never met a single copper , really must open myself to new experiences /j :)

  • not OP but in Polish there is no word for boyfriend or girlfriend, you just say boy or girl which is kinda funny. however because Polish has grammatical gender, you can say boy friend/girl friend and even enby friend, thanks to neoforms! (przyjaciel, przyjaciółka, przyjacioło)

    though note that partner is also gendered (partner, partnerka, partnerze)

  • something I'd like to add is that while you were not told the rules, you likely learned quite a few of them subconsciously.

    personally to this day I struggle with what present perfect and others are, but I can use them easily. similarly I can't say which grammatical case is which in my native language but I have no issue using them.

  • sorry but I think you are misjudging just how much you learn both grammar and vocabulary from speaking a language natively and possibly misjudging how well education can teach someone a language

    languages are these surprisingly complex and irregular things, which are way easier to learn by doing than by trying. often entering school you can already use tenses or grammatical structures that students learning English as a second language will struggle with a few years later in their educational journey, while you can spend that time unknowingly building up an even better subconscious understanding of the language.

    Besides, from my experience, having basic Polish and extended English mind you, the tasks you are expected to do in the lessons of ones native language require a way higher degree of mastery than those in the second language of a pupil.

    Also, it should be noted that non native speakers, or fluent speakers of multiple languages, can often borrow things from another language into English, either translating fraises literary (ex. once in a Russian year instead of once per blue moon) or using a unrelated word which happens to have a connection in the other language for other reasons (ex. castle and zipper both translate to "zamek" in Polish)

    also mind that for a not insignificant number of people, though due to how more connected our world is today this has slightly decreased in the recent years, the level of English they ended up with from school is quite poor.

  • I mean yeah it is very overblown , sorry I did not make it clear

  • honestly , while I believe this is random=funny, I think it is interesting to interpret:

    I believe that the person is a transmasc individual , who had a supportive grandma , but she died and he has been sent to conversion therapy by his unsupportive parents

  • Programmer Humor @lemmy.ml
    MinekPo1 @lemmy.ml

    I've found the recent typescript 3x3 magic square checker entertaining. Anyway here is a arbitrary magic square checker using c++ type traits.

    ::: spoiler alt

     c++
        
    #include <type_traits>
    
    // from https://stackoverflow.com/a/8625010/12469275
    // cmath's sqrt is constexpr from c++26
    constexpr std::size_t isqrt_impl
        (std::size_t sq, std::size_t dlt, std::size_t value){
        return sq <= value ?
            isqrt_impl(sq+dlt, dlt+2, value) : (dlt >> 1) - 1;
    }
    
    constexpr std::size_t isqrt(std::size_t value){
        return isqrt_impl(1, 3, value);
    }
    
    // because pack indexing is only in c++26
    template <std::size_t I, typename T = void, std::size_t... V>
    struct At;
    
    template <std::size_t I>
    struct At<I, void> {};
    
    template <std::size_t V0, std::size_t... V>
    struct At<0, void, V0, V...> {
        static const std::size_t value = V0;
    };
    
    template <std::size_t I, std::size_t V0, std::size_t... V>
    struct At<I, std::enable_if_t<I != 0 && I <= sizeof...(V),void>, V0, V...> {
        static const std::size_t value = At<I-1, void, V...>::value;
    };
    
    template <std::size_t A, std::size_t B>
    struct Add {
        static const std::size_t value = A + B;
    };
    
    template <std::size_t begin
      
    test @lemmy.ml
    MinekPo1 @lemmy.ml

    test post