Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K

Kinkisthebest

@ Kinkisthebest @lemmy.org

Posts
9
Comments
26
Joined
8 mo. ago

  • Removed

    To those who think that you should experience everything in the world at least once:

    Jump

  • Just look at the kind of language they are using.

  • Removed

    To those who think that you should experience everything in the world at least once:

    Jump

  • I was actually talking about things that bring happiness fastly like drugs but i think i should have explicitly stated that.

  • Removed

    To those who think that you should experience everything in the world at least once:

    Jump

  • Yeah lol but I didnt expect them to get offended this much.

  • Removed

    To those who think that you should experience everything in the world at least once:

    Jump

  • Is it wrong though? Seeing new things makes you less happier because it will be hardder for you to be happy. Imagine your childhood, you became happy for smaller things right? Wouldnt you want that to continue throughout your life or at least to some degree. Look at this child, https://www.reddit.com/r/ContagiousLaughter/comments/1hpt2nz/istambul_ice_cream/ he is so happy. Now, would you be happy like that child ever again this simply? No, because you have seen more than him. We do everything to be happy in the end.

  • Why are property rights seen as capitalist in themselves?

    Jump

  • It is cruel if you keep it while other people dont have anywhere to live.

  • Why are property rights seen as capitalist in themselves?

    Jump

  • The bread was just an example. This can be anything. I mean communism doesnt mean that people can enter your house without your consent. If they need land to live, the society will give them one even if it means giving up some of your own land so no one will be left without somewhere to live but as i said, it will still become their property. So, there is nothing wrong about property ownership as long as you divide them equally.

  • Progressive Politics @lemmy.world
    Kinkisthebest @lemmy.org

    Why are property rights seen as capitalist in themselves?

  • Aren't Protestants and especially Calvinists just slaves without masters? Why aren't we just enslaving protestants?

    Jump

  • Aren't Protestants and especially Calvinists just slaves without masters? Why aren't we just enslaving protestants?

    Jump

  • Almost all of them I mean why do you think they supported Ronald Reagan so much and now Trump too. Here is your proof. Just look up who they voted for lol that will be your proof.

  • Aren't Protestants and especially Calvinists just slaves without masters? Why aren't we just enslaving protestants?

    Jump

  • Calvin says "It is enough to be successful at your job in for the lord to love you" and "The only job of business owners and traders should be increasing their wealth because even the god gave the duty of ruling over others to them". Zubritski, Kerov, Mitropelski, The Primitive Community, the Slave Society, the Feudal Society, p.257 I read the book in a different laguage so made the translation by myself but of course you can find it in english too. So dear friend, it is perfectly ethical for calvinists to work their asses off without asking for much in return since business owners have to be as greedy as possible meaning that they should give as little as possible to their workers and in return, the only thing god wants from workers is to be good at their job and it is enough. Furthermore, Calvinists also believe that god chose an elected few and gave them the wealth and they will also go to heaven while all others will go to hell no matter what and thats why they are poor. By that logic, it is perfectly ethical for protestants if we ensave them and make them work for us for almost nothing in return and abuse them as much as we want too. We can eat an entire table of food while watching them suffer and beg us to give them some food even a single piece of bread and not even give that one since they also respect property rights at its fullest and they wil still find this ethical. I hope this explains.

  • Aren't Protestants and especially Calvinists just slaves without masters? Why aren't we just enslaving protestants?

    Jump

  • You are saying that but those protestant wil enslave us without a second thought. In fact we are already their slaves. They werre the slave owners before too. Arent all business owners trump reagan etc all protestants? What Im trying to say is that in this system which they are protecting one side will always enslave the other one so why shouldnt it be them? They would enslave black people today if they had the chanace as well i mean wasnt it protestants who established kkk and defended slavery? They will be okay with being slaves too. Why do you think there are more protests in France than there is in the UK or US? Everyone will be ruled in the way which they deserve and thats what they want too in fact they think god wants them to be that way so lets give them what they want. We will be happy in this world through using products which they will produce and they will be happy in the afterlife, everyone will be happy so why not?

  • Aren't Protestants and especially Calvinists just slaves without masters? Why aren't we just enslaving protestants?

    Jump

  • No, it is moral if they consent and they will consent because thats their belief. We will not put them in chains, they will do this voluntarily. We just have to forcibly take away their wealth and then they will be okay with it since they will become the losing side since thats what they believe and they will also believe that they deserved to be in that situation. In conclusion, they will be voluntary slaves and leave slavery if they leave protestantism. We have a lot of poor and homeless people suffering because of their beliefs and the system they have built so why is it not fair if we do the same?

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world
    Kinkisthebest @lemmy.org

    Aren't Protestants and especially Calvinists just slaves without masters? Why aren't we just enslaving protestants?

  • Does Lemmy have more freedom of speech than Reddit?

    Jump

  • thank you so much

  • Does Lemmy have more freedom of speech than Reddit?

    Jump

  • I mean if mods ban people for not agreeing with them basically.

  • Does Lemmy have more freedom of speech than Reddit?

    Jump

  • I know what freedom of speech really means im a political science masters degree student at the moment. I didnt mean the constitution when i said "freedom of speech". Im just asking if mods ban people basically for not agreeing with their opinions.

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world
    Kinkisthebest @lemmy.org

    Does Lemmy have more freedom of speech than Reddit?

  • It is crazy that some people believe simply asking him nicely is going to work

    Jump

  • It is crazy that some people believe simply asking him nicely is going to work

    Jump

  • Please elaborate

  • Progressive Politics @lemmy.world
    Kinkisthebest @lemmy.org

    It is crazy that some people believe simply asking him nicely is going to work

  • United Rules

    Jump

  • From the Ohrid Lake to the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, Macedonia will be free.

  • Progressive Politics @lemmy.world
    Kinkisthebest @lemmy.org

    Why don't we have politicans like Huey Long these days who can propose to change the system completely?

  • Progressive Politics @lemmy.world
    Kinkisthebest @lemmy.org

    Refuting arguements against communists

  • Progressive Politics @lemmy.world
    Kinkisthebest @lemmy.org

    What do people here think about Huey Long?

  • Here is why the American left is always going to lose:

    Jump

  • I told keeping wages in line with productivity do describe how it was before Reagan in the US. I didnt say its leftism.

  • Here is why the American left is always going to lose:

    Jump

  • Thats not manipulation. What I was trying to say was that the leftist movement should only be about economic inequality until we solve it. This is not manipulation since you would not be promising other groups of people anything else. So, your supporters would know that the only thing they will get will be economic equality in return of their support. So its not lying to anyone. I should tell you that being rich is awesome. Its the best thing a human being could ever ask for after health of course. Money is so great that it makes anything else unimportant. I can live a luxurious life without even moving a single finger. Im 22 and I have a total of 200k dollars in my account on different assets. This is just the amount i made from the money my parents gave me throughout my life to spend it with my friends. Now that I graduated from university, my father will give me my first house next month. it has 4 room and a very large house. So now Im asking you, do you think i would give a single fuck if someone was racist to me or sexist to me or anything else? NO. Because I have everything I want my ears wouldnt even hear what they are saying. Im writing this so that you can understand how important money really is.

    So yes, we cannot strive for equality in all forms since as i said, the only class which will have the upper hand when united is the poor class against the rich. Any other weak side of any conflict will be weaker when united than the superior side. The only time the oppressed class will become majority against their oppressors when united is the working class people. For example, trans people will be less in numbers against non trans people, gay people will be less in numbers against non gay people. This will result in you pushing away those superior side people ive mentioned and thus, you will not be able to create a revolting group against the rich since those people you pushed away will start defending the rich. Why do you think so many young people voted for trump when they cannot even afford to have a family? Because the left of today failed to have the upper hand in terms of numbers by taking only minorities on their side and pushing the majority to the other.

  • Progressive Politics @lemmy.world
    Kinkisthebest @lemmy.org

    Here is why the American left is always going to lose: