It depends on which aspects of the environmental impact you're looking at, as melting glass to recycle it can be much more damaging than landfilling several plastic bottles if the glass furnace is heated by fossil fuels. If glass bottles are washed and reused, they're much better than plastic, but that's rarely what happens.

Then I've got some bad news for you about Putin, too.

Part of the point of ReactOS is that it can use the existing Windows drivers for existing hardware, so every driver that doesn't work is because of a bug that needs to be fixed. Even if no one uses a particular piece of hardware, the same bug might have stopped another driver for another piece of hardware working.

Just like a guide dogs collection box

As someone else said, installing things outside of Program Files is generally only necessary if they were made for XP or older, and the developers didn't test on Vista or newer or read the bit of the Windows documentation that said not to write to an application's installation directory because it might not work on future versions that was there since the early nineties. Regular Oblivion works fine in Program Files (although it makes it more of a pain to mod) and the Remaster was obviously made post-Vista.

All that said, none of this is relevant because you've got the Windows App version, which uses a completely different system and works in a partial sandbox so doesn't interact with the rest of the computer like a traditional program would.

If you're dying of thirst, you wouldn't appreciate a life preserver and if you were drowning, you wouldn't appreciate a glass of water. Lots of men are so compliment-starved that they'd appreciate being catcalled even with all the negative implications, and I imagine that plenty of men who catcall have never considered that them appreciating the same in reverse wouldn't mean there's no good reason for women not to want to be catcalled.

The scanner's part of security, which is potentially shared between multiple airlines with multiple cabin bag weight limits, so it wouldn't make sense as the place to weigh things. It only works if it's done somewhere airline-specific, like check-in or boarding.

The interpreter can't make the replacement until it's about to execute the line as __bool__ and __len__ are both (Python's equivalent of) virtual functions, so it's got to know the runtime type to know if the substitution is valid. Once it's that late, it'll often be faster to execute the requested function than work out if it could execute something faster instead. Even with type hints, it's possible that a subclass with overridden methods could be passed in, so it's not safe to do anything until the real runtime type is known.

Once there's a JIT involved, there's an opportunity to detect the common types passed to a function and call specialised implementations, but I don't think Python's JIT is clever enough for this. LuaJIT definitely does this kind of optimisation, though.

That kind of bioplastic tends not to biodegrade naturally, instead requiring a heated industrial composter with specially engineered enzymes added. If it's disposed of properly, it's great, otherwise it's no better than traditional plastic but costs more. Also, not all bioplastics biodegrade at all as all the word means is that the source material is biomass rather than oil.

None of that takes anything away from my original point that participating more can make things less bad. I never even said that violent action was distinct from participation, just that it's not the easiest form of participation to convince people to do, and that attempting a revolution (which is a huge step up from bombing a few factories and assassinating a few CEOs) won't go well if it's not got broad popular support or police and military backing. I've had enough arguments with tankies who insisted that it was easy to overthrow a capitalist state with twelve guys who believed hard enough in communism to magically generate an army, and there was no point in any other form of participation, that the thread looked to me like it might be about to summon the never vote, just wait for a revolutionary communist army to form people.

Possibly, but the point of the Supreme Court in the UK is to figure out what the law means when laws aren't clear, and that's allowed to include asking the people who wrote it.

Thunderbird is basically an Outlook-from-fifteen-years-ago clone, and I've always disliked Outlook, even before the recent push to make it even worse. Everything I disliked about old Outlook is exactly the same in Thunderbird, except the licence.

I don't want much from a mail client, just:

• basic stuff works
• I can see an unread email count for each of my accounts at the same time, and also have the list of messages for the account I'm looking at and a reading/writing pane at the same time, too.

Thunderbird and Outlook will only show the unread count once you've expanded the list of directories in an account, so once you've got more than two accounts with a reasonable number of folders, any further accounts end up pushed off the bottom of the screen. This isn't something that a theme for Thunderbird can change. It'd be a small change to include a total unread count next to the list item for each account when it wasn't expanded and a total unread count next to the combined inbox button, but I'm not maintaining a fork of a mail client myself when it'd still be too Outlook-like to avoid being annoying.

In the end, I settled on Mailspring, but it doesn't score brilliantly on the basic stuff works bullet point.

I think you've misunderstood a lot of my comment.

The US' democracy is advertised as giving the population what they want, but it's designed so that it doesn't give the population what they want unless everyone votes and does so in their best interests, and it's also designed so that lots of people don't vote and if they do, they vote against their interests. That way, there's the illusion of giving people what they want so they don't revolt, but powerful people have their interests prioritised.

Because the system has to have an illusion of working in normal people's interests, it's got a failure mode where it starts approximating working in people's interests when more people vote and more people engage enough to know which options on the ballot are closest to being in their interests.

I'm not saying that magically getting everyone to know who they should vote for and then show up to the polls is feasible, just that refusing to participate because the system's 'broken' is what the system wants and how it makes sure it keeps doing the things it does.

When one of the flaws is that it's designed to only function as advertised if there's full participation, participating harder can make things less bad, and participating less can make things worse.

Either way, it's much easier to convince people to go out and vote than it is to convince them to take up arms in a revolution, kill their opponents, and risk being killed or imprisoned as a consequence. If your revolutionary faction can't gather enough people to win an election, then it doesn't have enough support to win a civil war without getting the police and military on its side, and that's not going to happen in the US.

The basic Mail app in Windows 10 is still the baseline I compare every other email client to, and I've yet to find anything I like as much. Unfortunately, for obvious reasons, it only ever ran under Windows, and for stupid reasons, it was deprecated and now if you try to launch it, it exits and launches Outlook (New), which is a horrible email client.

You'd need to test every cell in the embryo to be sure none of them had off-target mutations, and DNA sequencing doesn't leave the cell alive, so you can't prove it worked without killing the embryo. He tested some of the cells and discarded embryos where those cells were damaged, but there's no way to know if the untested cells in the embryos were fine, and given what we know about the reliability, it's more likely that there are problems than not.

The linked Wikipedia article says only their fathers were HIV-positive, and typically that wouldn't lead to a parent infecting their child unless they decided to share needles etc.

He was found guilty of medical malpractice after gene editing babies by treating their embryos with CRISPR/Cas9. He claims that he was trying to make them resistant to HIV, and that medical ethics are preventing cures from being discovered, but his critics say that we know CRISPR is too unreliable to use on a genome the size of a human's, and is more likely to introduce dangerous mutations than apply the intended change, hence why no one else has done this before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/He_Jiankui

Transphobes think all trans people are scary rapist men looking for a way past the impenetrable magic barrier that only lets women into women's toilets, and that there's no reason anyone would want to go into the men's toilets, so trans men are fictional and don't need or want any rights, just like the law doesn't give rights to elves and hobgoblins.

It's already a stretch to assume that men complaining about loneliness are happy with the number of male friends that they've got, but it's a bigger stretch to assume that what they did to get their male friends should also get non-male friends. There are still men who haven't realised that women are people and that to befriend them, you need to talk to them as if they're people, but they're not the ones referring to a male loneliness epidemic, and would instead blame conspiracy theories where crazed feminists want to do evil deeds or whatever nonsense it is that the likes of Andrew Tate peddle. Plenty of men just don't meet anyone new, and on the rare occasions when they do, it's when engaging in a male-dominated hobby or at a male-dominated workplace, and so it's another man. E.g. for reasons I don't understand, all the bars near me where it's quiet enough to have a conversation (the bare minimum to befriending someone) are almost exclusively attended by men. After you've shown up a few times, you might be friends with the regulars, but no matter how effectively you make friends with them, they'll still all be men.

You're probably right that no one would listen if you made a video, as anyone who needs to hear the thing you're trying to explain is too entrenched exclusively watching manosphere influencers, and anyone without that kind of terminal brainrot already knows what you're trying to tell them.