Grammatically, it doesn't say that. An act of aggression or a nuclear blah blah is vague enough that you can read it with or without a comma

That's not badly written. Thats intentionally vague so one can justify a lot of different responses. That's how these things work

What's homophobic about it?

How fucking horrible. The responses from the family don't paint them in a very good light either..

It's been the consistent recommendation since day 1.

There is a difference between approaching a solution with "no, it's not good enough" and "good, now let's make it better". It's not really different if you strip feeling out of it, but in a greater context, that feeling means something.

I agree with your responses, but you're overall using the former technique. That will rub people wrong and spark conflict.

Rape is an actual crime in the UK, it's not a crime by name in New Jersey. They're being consistent with charges based on the jurisdiction.

...is facing at least 10 years in prison if found guilty of first-degree aggravated sexual assault, second-degree sexual assault, and second-degree endangerment to the welfare of a child...

Those are the legal terms for different kinds of rape.

 undefined

    
L O V E
O
V
E

  

Is what it would be, and the pic is someone obviously making it wrong on purpose

Why would you spread this? That's the point of these things, to get a reaction out of people and get it seen by more people.

Stop making shit worse

Son of gold would be "goldson". "Goldman" would be a moniker for someone who worked with gold (miner, jeweler, gilder) or possessed/wore a lot of it.

Some sort of rule about verification may help your cause, and I hope it runs well for you

Without strong and trusted mods, this will be interesting..

Zelensky said something about X You said "well he didn't do anything about Y"

That's whataboutism. You may have meant it honestly, but ultimately what that kind of argument does is attempt to reduce zelenskys response to this action by comparing it to how he may have done something not as good in a different situation.

whispers you're eating polymers. The bad part of gum.

It's the same statement with extra steps. To pretend otherwise is to be willfully ignorant.

If you eat celery or beans, I've got bad news for you

Your first link is about micro plastics, and they even say not all brands have them. So if a product is made of plastic and doesn't always contain micro plastics (which are found in the air and water and soil and foods), then....polymers might not actually be plastics sometimes. Or in gum, many times.

Also silk, wool, cellulose, protein

Well, not quite. You'd have to have rights to the land to do that. Else someone could ride up and just take it from you.