Enderal, a whole new game built ontop of Skyrim. Offers an entirely different setting, map, class system, enemies, spells, and has an actual story that you will not soon forget.

If it's right to ridicule people for buying shein clothes, supporting sexist influencers or spending money on gacha games, then it's also OK to ridicule them for enjoying AI art. It is correct to be against behaviors that hurt society even if they don't have an immediate, direct effect on you. You deserve what you tolerate.

It helps that currently it's overwhelmingly dogshit, the linked video illustrating that quite well, with it being a random collection of glitched out, disconnected images with no soul. And don't get me started on the Suno slop flooding youtube...

Glowing praise from journalists and middling scores from youtube reviewers... Same exact situation as Veilguard even down to Mortisimal glazing it.

It's gonna be awful isnt it

it’s been an annual tradition of mine to play this game on Christmas Eve

Oh wow! I'm not the only one! It's nice that the bot issue seems to be severely reduced, this year is was the first one where I didn't have to switch servers multiple times to avoid masses of spinning snipers

Project: Gorgon is my forever home MMO, I'm not super active currently but am online for events and such. I've found it to be the only title on the market that feels like a world you join instead of a game you log in.

Haven't bought yet but I'm thinking of getting Old School Rally. I played a few racing games that looked just like this when I was a child so the visuals are giving me intense nostalgia

Rhinos! RRHHIIIIINNNOOEEESSS our enemies hide in METAL BAWKSES the cowards, the fools! We... we shall take away... their metal BAWKses.

Why? He is a historical figure. Why does a historical figure in his historical setting feel bizarre?

Why him being a “full fledged samurai” even matters?

This is just difference in opinion. For you it's OK. I get that this series is only very vaguely based on history but this is a step too far for me.

Seriously ask yourself why having ONE SINGULAR black protagonist in a series where protagonists have so far been overwhelmingly white

Why MUST they make the main character in a 1580's japanese setting black? The series hasn't had a single asian protagonist. Couldn't they have chosen a black history setting if this is what they wanted?

I just think it's bizarre to have a black dude protagonist in a historical japanese setting. I've read through the sources on Yasuke and I think it's a stretch to say he was like a full fledged samurai. Especially given that the biggest proponent of that theory, Thomas Lockley, made some sketchy edits between the Japanese and English version of his book on him.

Yeah fair enough, this stuff isn't unique to Californian developers, they are just the first that come to mind.

And does it not matter that it’s based on a historical figure?

Yasuke existed in Japan but I think they went too far in making him a protagonist. As I understand it he was a curiosity that Nobunaga kept around, not a full fledged samurai. I think it's also important to consider the current gaming landscape. There's titles like Dragon age Veilguard, Concord, Dustborn, Forspoken, Fintlock and others coming out these days that put heavy focus on inclusion/diversity over quality (as evidenced by poor sales numbers). It's hard to then look at an upcoming game set in historial Japan that somehow features a black protagonist and not think that they're trying to push some weirdo agenda rather than tell a cool story.

The point about translation, for instance

I want to touch up on this. The reason I didn't write much about my claim about for Yasuke not being a proper samurai is because it is my understanding that it is the default position and thus doesn't need to be proven by evidence. But if I was asked to provide evidence, I would link the comparison of his translated and untranslated book in this post. Since Thomas Lockley is the main source behind the myth, I think discrediting his book should be enough to also discredit Yasuke's role as a proper samurai.

I'm thinking of three games specifically from these studios, TLOU2 basing the whole narrative around a woman hulk, spiderman 2 with the long story segments as Mary jane and the whole debacle on Yasuke. But yeah it's not just these three california studios that are putting out games with this stuff, they are just the first that come to mind.

Nobody complained when Assassin’s Creed had Leonardo da Vinci hand you a tank or a glider

Yeah fair enough, people will have different lines in the sand for this stuff. I get that this series has time travel and aliens and whatever, but I think everyone can agree that if they randomly put, for example, modern sportscars into a historical setting it would be too unbelievable and ruin immersion. A massive black samurai slaughtering asians in feudal japan (and then seeing them bow down to him in another scene) has that effect for me.

(For the record I did look up on primary sources from japanese historians and everything points to the man being just Nobunaga's pet curiosity. It helps that here's all the shady stuff going on where the english and japanese versions of Thomas Lockley's books say different things)

Are you a racist?

I am not. I just dislike when developers sacrifice the game's story, quality or whatever in order to put in representation. I don't understand why the story can't just have a diverse cast and be done with it, right now it feels like all these studios are focusing on diversity first and foremost as a major selling point when it should be just a normal thing that doesn't need to be highlighted

I just dislike a lot of the studios based there (Insomniac, naughty dog, ubisoft) for how hard they try to push POC/minority representation in their games. Especially when it doesn't make sense (black samurai)

The rightwing/gamergate side not contesting this whole issue being called "Politics in videogames" is the biggest blunder. I don't know the best way to call this phenomenon (political preaching?) but surely there is a better phrase. Right now you can't talk about this stuff without getting hit by "Oh, you claim to hate politics in videogames yet you love Bioshock" type retort, when the actual thing people have problems with are californian nutcases pushing their views on US political crap onto the player as if it were gospel.

Your comparison to Satisfactory makes me think you're approaching the game with a completely wrong mindset. It's not supposed to be a chill sandbox playground with no difficulty where you rapidly conquer the planet and build cool stuff. It's intended to be an engaging survival game with a horror aspect of diving into dark depths and hoping that whatever lurks there doesn't notice you. It's meant to be atmospheric, with the threat of starvation, predators and later on some story aspects pushing you to explore further and deeper for materials and tech.

I hope you give the game anoher chance at some point because it really is a one of a kind experience. There's two things you should be aware of: First, in regards to another comment: there's no events for you to miss, IDK what that person is saying. There's two big plot points that happen in a playthrough regardless of your presence. Both of them give you a timer well in advance so you can show up to / observe the place when it happens. Everything else, like all the distress signals or abandoned bases? They're empty from the start of the game, even if you go there immediatelly nothing will change. You aren't missing out on anything.

Second, don't feel bad about missing out on upgrades or whatver. The vast majority of them are sidegrades. The important stuff that you need to progress both spawns much more often than the sidegrades, and you will often find it at the distress signal locations.

They don't reset, they just don't carry over, also your gear is severely debuffed. If you come back to the previous episode you'll still have the levels in that episode's skills.

I just finished watching Mugthief's video on the review conspiracy thing, it does make a lot of sense.

I went and checked my copy of Dragon Age Origins, and thankfully I'm not misremembering nor is it "just what I think", as on the back it says "A Dark Fantasy epic". That's what the series was, directly quoted from the creators behind it. Same thing with Inquisition, it was bleak, had tough choices, things were at stake. This new game couldn't be further from the previous titles - it doesn't belong.

I don't think it's right to keep your head down and say nothing when something you like is being taken in a direction you don't enjoy. Saying something critical against it doesn't hurt anyone, worst thing that could happen is not enough people agree and nothing changes.

It's not just gaming - people had a similar reaction on the trailer for the Megamind animated TV series. I think it's a difference in mindset, some people don't care while others see it as disrespect to their beloved franchise.

I’m willing to give it a fair shot

Personally I'm going to trust what the studio behind the game chose to showcase in the official reveal trailer. They're selling the game as a lighthearted, cartoony, high fantasy romp where a band of constantly quipping misfits save the world, all without a hint of seriousness anywhere. I don't care whether the game is good, it's not Dragon Age.

I am not hoping for a franchise I love to fail. What I am hoping for is that this imposter, which wears the series' skin purely for brand recognition, fails.

I am not aware of any conspiracy like that, It's just my personal hope.