Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)US
Posts
0
Comments
88
Joined
8 mo. ago
  • Sure if you go 100% soylent without ramping. Any major diet change usually ends up with diarrhea. Typically your body adjusts. Its the same tired trope when people complain about diarrhea from cuisuine they rarely eat.

    I've never done it but know multiple people who have lived off soylent(or alternatives) for long periods of time.

  • I agree to some extent. They're grossly overpriced. But I don't see many shoebox options. All the layouts feel oversized and not efficient. Including the few studios. Hell a lot places have 2 parking spots for most units because of zoning laws.

    I think American developers don't like to go small unless they're absolutely forced to.

  • What? All the new American apartments I've seen are luxury and full of nice amenities. Which I think is a problem because none of it is affordable. Even older apartments get renovated and the rent shoots up. I would love to see some practical and efficient apartments.

    This is Denver so your region my differ. From what I gather new bare bones apartments only exist in extreme cost of living areas like Sanfran or NYC.

  • There's a chance you die and that 2 mil will go to someone else vs your payments just stop.

    The 100k isn't matching inflation so you gain less wealth every year versus your potential 2 mil investment matching or beating inflation.

    I think the only real reason to do the 100k a year is if you're not very financially responsible. Which has been the case for many lottery winners.

    Edit: Personally not a fan of hoarding wealth outside enough for retirement/security.