The pawn double jumped. That means the queen was hanging last turn too.
As someone who’s already off social media (lemmy doesn’t count), I watched it and came to the conclusion I can still change my relationship with my phone. Uninstalled every game I had on it and any apps I haven’t used in a while. Aside from that, I also went into any apps that remained that were B tier in importance and removed their notifications permissions. No more spam tyvm.
Hah, my question isn’t because I’m a fatally flawed leftist, it’s because I’m a programmer and weekly I get requests from executives that simply aren’t possible or at least feasible to implement.
Your entire comment sounds exactly like one of these hand wavy requests from the heavens where details don’t matter. The cherry on top was you flipping it back at me so that I’d attempt to expand on your ill thought through plan and make it work. I’m sure you do well in the corporate landscape.
How would you go about enforcing it? What happens to the ceo whose wealth ticks about your 1000x threshold due to a good day on the stock market?
Classic they/them gramps
OP just chatting with themselves so they can screenshot it?
I’m trying to figure out how you could think that and my best guess is you’re just not familiar with modern dating apps.
There’s nothing real world about it. Women are overloaded with choice, men like everyone because they’re desperate and the apps prey on this, forcing pay to win strategies on men. It’s a brutal experience and makes you think women are just doing this for validation if you’re a guy, and if you’re a woman you just think men are dogs who would chase anything.
It’s the reality of dating apps, not real world behavior.
It’s the reality of dating apps, not real world behavior.
You know what? I’m slightly more confident about the AIs chances compared to his team of 20 year old lead by Big Ballz.
I seem to be able to avoid them in almost all situations except for subscriber notifications. For some reason non-short creators that I subscribed too are now jumping on this trend and their shorts get pushed to me too.
The software may change but these tests show it’s the hardware that’s limiting them. If the Tesla can’t see a kid through fog, it doesn’t matter what software you pick, that kid gunna die.
You can be XYY and doctors will shorten that informally to YY. https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/what-are-yy-chromosomes
No idea but it must make OP chuckle
They do, and you’re right. Morality policing and prigs are not my thing.
I don’t accept that because everyone’s doing it or “group-think” are valid excuses do jump on a trend. Things like this maybe don’t seem like a big deal for you but for those that hate this culture it’s just one more example of a dumb change being shoved down their throats. This could also be the straw that breaks the camels back.
Sadly? Master branch never implied the existence of a slave branch. It was one of the dumbest pieces of woke incursion into tech.
Doubt it. The LGB part of the equation aren’t hard for the average Joe to empathize with, they honestly would have skyrocketed in terms of acceptance years ago without the T group. The first 3 letters are just who you’re attracted to, the last letter is who you are and that’s a much bigger deal to a lot of people.
Blur license plates when posting online you tard
This is a game theory scenario:
- I’m too lazy too lazy to wash my hands or don’t feel it’s necessary. Upon encountering this door I see both handles and decide to follow their instructions and open the door for unwashed hands. My hands are now unspeakably filthy as filthy people following the signs have accumulated a ton of germs on this handle. I get sick.
- I was my hands, follow the signs and use the washed handle. Unbeknownst to me some unwashed game theorists decided that obviously the handle for washed hands would be cleaner so they used it without actually washing their hands first. It’s now also filthy.
- I didn’t wash my hands, I don’t give a fuck about signs, use the one most convenient for me.