Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SA
Posts
0
Comments
35
Joined
2 yr. ago
  • Name, address, phone number, Bank info, nude photos of yourself, etc. If the info being released could harm you or in some way negatively impact your life, assume it would be sent to China or anywhere else on the world wide web if you ran it without following the previous guidelines.

  • Tbh, if you don't know what that means, you can't trust it.

    Though, it means that unless it's running locally on your own hardware and not in the cloud and you haven't verified the source code directly (or someone else you trust hasn't) then assume it is nefarious and do not give it any personal or sensitive information you wouldn't want anyone on the Internet to know.

  • Friend, I hope you can continue enjoying life and it isn't past tense only. If you're unsure, please reach out and find the help you need 💙

    As for your sentiment, I feel the same, cosmic dust but okay with that thought; enjoy life as it is, unworried about what is or is not after.

  • I'd even be happy with there being a choice between "either release tools needed to unlock and run services necessary to function OR release all source code to public domain so someone else is able to fix and rebuild the software as necessary"

    If I pay for something they shouldn't be able to disable it

  • 12 peers can be coerced. If he still runs the rest of the country should be sufficient to not vote for him if he is undeserving of being elected. In theory it should be more difficult just by way of having more scrutiny into the type of person he is to the voters.

  • But a government that potentially is nefariously attempting to block a candidate shouldn't be able to bar someone from being elected.

    eg. An English loyalist blocks George Washington from being president by fraudulently getting him convicted of a felony; is that a reasonable thing we should have codified in the Constitution?

    Do I want trump to be elected? Hell no. I also don't feel like we should go down the road where a political opponent can block someone from running illegitimately, either.

  • So, let's say a political party is somehow at fault for charging and getting a verdict of an opponent. This would make it very easy to block anyone from running against the party in power if they so choose.

    The founding fathers saw how much of an issue this would be so limited the reasons for blocking someone from running for office. I don't think hush money is a good reason (though, doing so to block info that would make him lose an election I think should be but that will be up to the court)

  • I can't even use my smart card because Ubuntu keeps trying to install the snap version of Firefox which can't access the hardware. Why does it keep swapping out every time I update releases? Why won't it let me be happy?! /cry

  • Not sure why it matters. Ignore the links and don't click them if you don't want to. They're still posting content, why did it actually matter other than some moral high ground for "pure" content or whatever you want to tell yourself.

    As long as it isn't copy pasted from some professional site and is at least the person posting their own stuff, I don't care what their reasoning behind posting is.