I don’t fundamentally disagree with the principle, but it’s easier to police malignant behavior if nudity is confined to limited social spaces (eg. beaches, gyms, saunas, ect…)
Otherwise you give creepos the ability to ruin random public spaces randomly with very little enforcement potential - but I guess it depends on what of the two restricted scenarios is the lesser evil.
It’s okay, I got banned from hexbear / chapo for saying Slava Ukraine.
They’re just pissy little bitches - > happy to ban people who are not they’re favorite flavor of perpetually online leftists familiar with whatever YouTube flame wars they follow that week.
Don’t worry - more time to read theory and develop praxis comrade
If the Democrats running the states were serious about protecting their constituents they would bring murder and state-level RICO charges against the appropriate members of ICE.
But all I hear is a hollow “please don’t do this”
Fuck this two party, techno-fascist enabling system.
People need to stand up to protect themselves - no one else is in these situations
That is so cool, appreciate the link and detail. My mother makes and cultivates sour dough cultures. Something for me to talk about with her and maybe experiment with. Motivating!
Based on reported experiences, privately run for-profit centers are maximizing profit at the expense of providing appropriate care. They do so by:
Pushing for maximum weekly hours they can charge public/private insurers based on coverage (without deferment to child/family needs)
Using in some cases remote/foreign low cost labor for diagnosis / non-care provision, while charging US rates
Aggressive sales tactics
Paying high wages to new graduates, but with a low ceiling on wages and high case load, leading to rotating care to the detriment of building a strong relationship with patients
Most of the providers are good people who mean well and want to help children. The problem is there is a lack of available services and centers for these families, so if the model weren’t so profit centric at the expense of disabled children the added investment would be welcome
Don’t fully track the finer points, eg. & IMO more likely to be a push towards the autocratic stewards managing Trump as a lame duck tainted by the Epstein scandal and policy backlash going into 2026. But yeah… tracks generally
This the money comment IMo