Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
2
Comments
4010
Joined
10 mo. ago

  • Selbst wenn es den Kindern massiv hilft, ist es das wert, dafür auf Anonymität zu verzichten?

    Andererseits, gibt es überhaupt noch ausreichend Anonymität, die gerettet werden sollte?

  • where Russia’s allies critized their invasion of Ukraine

    What does that have to do with the US being or not being the hegemon?

    there’s a growing rival, China

    Growing. Are they there yet? As far as I know they can't project their power globally, unlike the US.

    So the US are "still a hegemon".

  • Right now, we do what we can to fix things.

    Are people doing enough?

    Most people don't do what they can.Trump can do whatever he wants because Putin got him elected and most people haven't voted for him, or voted for him and agree.

    I hadn't noticed the strong link between guilt and responsibility. I just think that people are responsible. But now it makes sense as a strategy:

    This is the point where one person is singled out as the cause of the trouble and is expelled or killed by the group. This person is the scapegoat. Social order is restored as people are contented that they have solved the cause of their problems by removing the scapegoated individual, and the cycle begins again.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating#Scapegoat_mechanism

    Trump is a scapegoat that takes all the guilt so people are not motivated to act.

    Coincidentally this and Girard in general are Peter Thiel's favorite theory so my guess is that it is done on purpose.

    Which leaves the question how people can be motivated to act according to their abilities. All the skills are there. How do they know that it is their turn to act to maintain international law?

  • That could very well be true but where is that a problem in my comment?

  • The US is illegally bombing Iran without repercussions. No sanctions from anybody, hardly any criticism from the allies. To me, that's still a hegemon.

  • without just funneling the money

    Similarly, among all the engineers, who selects the competent ones? We have market economies because central planning has shown its limits. Shouldn't we trust the process and support the market in figuring it out?

  • start from square 1 and centrally plan every step

    How do we find the people who can do that?

  • Including them. They can feel less guilty, but democracy means that the people decide and they are part of the people.

    If they don't agree with the vote they have to look for means to convince the rest and change the vote.

  • Es gibt kein Universum, in dem dieser Krieg den Interessen der Vereinigten Staaten dient.

    Allein um die Lieferung vieler Drohnen zu verhindern, die gegen die Ukraine genutzt werden, lohnt sich ein Angriff.

    Dann ist der Iran ein wichtiger Energielieferant für China.

    Der Iran hat starken Einfluss auf die Shiiten, welche in Saudiarabien in den Erdölgebieten wohnen.

    Der Iran unterstützt Yemen und gefährdet so die Nutzung des Suez Kanals.

    Wenn die USA Russland und China angreifen, wird der Iran eine wichtige Logistikroute.

    Europa könnte auf iranisches Gas ausweichen und den Verkauf von Frackinggas gefährden.

    Es gibt sicher viele weitere Gründe.

  • Woher können wir dann wissen, ob eine Mehrheit den Regime Change will?

  • Wenn die Menschen dort nicht ganz explizit sagen würden, dass sie die Angriffe begrüßen,

    Wie groß ist der Anteil von denen, die es befürworten?

  • Then it's a dumb take that you are responsible since 1970.

    But since you have been an adult, as a member of a democracy, you are responsible for what the democracy does. That's the deal. The election decides. If the majority decides something bad, bad luck, that's still shared among everybody.

  • Ist halt die Frage, wen man erreichen will und was man erreichen will. Falsch ist es nicht. Die 25% AfD Wähler bekommt man so allerdings nicht zurück.

  • This is backwards. The US is the hegemon. They set the standard. The others don't follow the rules because the US were breaking them.

  • In democracies there are no innocent people. Everybody is complicit in not shifting energy sources since the 1970ies.

  • We buy the much more expensive US fracking gas. That spike is a minor blip to Europe.

  • Zeichen der Zeit einfach nicht sehen wollen und auch bei Neuanschaffung nach wie vor auf US Provider setzen.

    Oder sie wissen was sie tun, der Westen ist nur oberflächlich gespalten und Trump ist der bad cop, durch den der Westen beliebig Krieg führen kann.

  • Now put a map of youth unemployment, average income and housing prices next to it.

  • Die AfD ist aber anders als Wasser für nass nicht der Auslöser von Nationalsozialismus. Im Gegenteil, es wird argumentiert, dass die AfD schlecht ist, weil sie nationalsozialistisch ist.

    Wenn Menschen die AfD gut finden, sich nicht als Nazis identifizieren und die AfD nicht als Nazis erkennen, wie werden sie darauf reagieren, wenn man sie als Nazis beschimpft?

  • World News @lemmy.world

    CARE Crisis Report: Ten Overlooked Humanitarian Crises That Didn't Make Headlines in 2025

    www.care.org /media-and-press/care-crisis-report-ten-overlooked-humanitarian-crises-that-didnt-make-headlines-in-2025/
  • Europe @feddit.org

    The Draghi Report about Private Investments within the EU (part B, page 281)

    commission.europa.eu /topics/competitiveness/draghi-report_en