Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
7
Comments
319
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I live and breathe this stuff

    SQLAlchemy AsyncSession calls greenlet_spawn which wraps a Session sync method. For async dialect+driver, the sqlalchemy dbapi driver will make async connections.

    Hey lets make an async call. You mean rewrite the exact code except with dispersed await sprinkled about? Fuck that! Once is enough. Instead wrap the sync call in a greenlet_spawn. And then return to the gulag of static type checking hell forever.

    So is it async all the way thru? No. It's async enough™

  • btw use mypy AND pyright. The OP writes, mypy OR pyright.

    mypy -- chokes on excessive number of overloads. Annoyingly runs forever.

    pyright -- more verbose; finds issues mypy never will

    So when mypy broke had to use pyright. Then fixed mypy by ignoring a module and some configuration voodoo.

  • Great read. Enjoyed the comparison between JS and Python.

    Had to guess DX means developer experience. Hey i live in a hut on the moon. We don't have youtube.

  • Boss picks up on office chatter and gets to thinking, we've dug to the bottom of the barrel and then some, attracting a host of degenerates scum from across the planet. Having reached bottom, still digging, are coming on the truly below barrel dredge, which rank despicable bastards, will fit right in with the latest waves of jihadi hordes and related scum, yeah we are talk'n about Python coders toss tosers been coming ashore to spread chaos and strict type checking misery. They can't stop making more static type checkers. The wankers. You can guess how popular that'll be with the public. Luckily they'll just have to learn to live with, respect, and ensure the dignity of Python coders who'll insist on strict static typing, yet not switch to a strong typed language.

    So why is this so important to uas now?

    Well it sorta makes sense yeah, no one is goo-na b'lieve yah argh intelligent and uh superior race by speaking 36,000 Romance languages, nah you wanna come off as well off in the age of AI, ya goo-na knead aaaaa--t least a few Python mates. It's obvious picking up yet another human language is pointless when ML can just real time translate it. Reminds me, lets take the piss outta Google again for being right smart bastards. We'll have 'em pissing in their breaches.

    So i got to chatting with this lady about ... well can't remember much kinda drunk outta my mind at the time. Something like uh, ... data frames. So m' colleagues been saying gotta get tits deep in pandas right. I said ladies, you gotta return the pandas to the Tibetians. They were like i get right on that, then some of 'em be snickering off in the corner. Laughing hahaha we both Chinese.

  • Everyone commenting have read and understood the article. Perhaps the nuance of the conversation is just going over your head. Your commentary is your personal opinion, which is outside of the source material. What you copy+pasted is exactly what we've commented on.

    The article never said "reviewing Gnome extensions, where LLM was used, is a huge waste of time". You are adding to what's said. The adults are not pulling from outside the article.

    We are stating what the article lacks. We are not hallucinating. So if we are not hallucinating then you must not be following. Reread it a few times until you get it.

  • A saner organization would also hit up submitters for a reviewer's fee. This would reduce AI spam. Barriers to entry matter.

    A reviewers fee is equivalent to Canonical offering customer support contracts. Obviously a person that needs to lean on AI as a crutch, is just screaming out for reviewers to act as advisers. The reviewer just wielding the giant DENIED stamp is fun, but doesn't address the issue of noobs implicitly asking to work with a consultant.

    gnome reviewers obviously never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity.

  • They should state a justification. Not merely what they are looking for to identify AI generated code.

    The justification could be the author is unlikely to be capable of maintenance. In which case the extension is just going to inconvenience/burden onto others.

    So far their is no justification stated besides, da fuk and yuk.

  • Hard to prevent gangs/tribes/cartels from running as a team. Better to tackle issues we can have an effect on.

    Wise to choose which battles wish to fight rather than having them chosen for us

  • i should be in. Thanks for putting that oversight onto my radar.

  • i'm in the privacy is a human right party. Since this issue applies to everyone giving everyone the label pirate is nonsense.

    Realize the pirate party does have the same stance. Only complaining about their unfortunate name.

  • Politically I back the Monero community, privacy advocates, and FOSS community.

    Have publicly voted for bitcoin since 2014. My candidate has won, will win, and will continue to win well into the future.

    bitcoin is a euphemism meaning Monero for those who only know what the MSM tells them.

    Prefer income to come in the form of cryptocurrency (without strings attached). So can honestly say, at least, 40% more in the right.

    How well does your political leanings pay?

  • What the hell is a centralist within the context of OP's topic? The folks just observing and doing nothing no laughing no photos? People who took car that day?

    Is there such a thing as a centralist? That's like saying, "somewhere on the line". Whereas if you look at my comments i'm everywhere on the line. Trying to imagine how to advocate a centralist viewpoint but coming up with nothing.

  • Am i a gang member? No. So that leaves you and me in the same group, "fcked". Anarchist is a merely a superfluous label. Even if our views didn't 100% align perfectly, the same ills affect us both.

    Unless you are interested in recruiting me in some gang. Errr are you?

  • not assuming a political flavor or gang/tribe membership

  • Wait a sec! Why wouldn't socialism rely on privacy-invading surveillance? They'd even be more inclined even after getting caught and told no.

    From govts POV, The People are not making sufficient efforts, to protect our own privacy so it's not a problem.

    Gov't corps will do whatever they can get away with. We live under "Rule of Lawyerism", not "Rule of law".

    Unfortunately we need to make efforts to protect ourselves rather than continue not protecting ourselves.

    The State will never protect you nor does it represent you. We are just marks.

  • your Google account is old enough to go fight Europe's wars

  • Meta is funded by govt. A Canadian company created the original tech. A UK bootlicking socialist country of yes men.

    Most open source software coders form foundations hoping to attract gov't funding.

    So tell me again how socialism had nothing to do with why/how these glasses came into being.

  • You argued we don't live in a socialist society. Which is a typical argument by those schooled about the fallacy of that capitalism exists.

    Laid out what we actually live under without isms, besides indulging in using the term, lawyerism. You are trying to argue economics. As am i.

    Usually neither side dares to describe reality and instead each side just repeats their favorite theory from public school textbooks. I just described what my lying eyes see.

  • I get satisfaction by designing complex systems and being tortured by static type checkers. So political pr0n, video games, or 2D chart p0rn does not do it for me. Don't expect my motivations to be the same as those listed addictions. In a world covered in smartphone addicts, it's really hard to imagine someone completely devoid of those addictions.

    A rage addict is just someone suffering from a design flaw. I recognize they exist just like trees. A tree producing imperfect fruit does not bug me. The rage addict needs to become capable of weening themselves off the juice. I'm a white hatter. Exploiting system flaws is black hatter. Hope de-assembling nonsense arguments has been helpful.

    At one time, thought feeding a rage addict would burn out their rage addiction by having them exhaust themselves. All about coming to the conclusion that it's not worth the effort. But that assumes they can learn, want to learn, or want to adapt/change permanently.

    Rage addicts need to recognize they are being played. Until then it's just a broken record on a loop.

    This works on any negative emotion. It takes heightened energy to sustain. So fight a war of attrition knowing you'll exhaust your opponent.

  • Python @programming.dev

    the guy in charge of random data base object names

    github.com /fastapi/sqlmodel/issues/264
  • Programming Horror @programming.dev

    duck hunting

  • Python @programming.dev

    Dependency management

    pypi.org /project/wreck
  • Python @programming.dev

    Feedback on gh profile design

    github.com /msftcangoblowm/
  • Python @programming.dev

    Whats in a Python tarball

  • Python @programming.dev

    PEP 735 does dependency group solve anything?

    peps.python.org /pep-0735/
  • Python @programming.dev

    constraint vs requirement. What's the difference?