Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CE
Posts
2
Comments
20
Joined
1 yr. ago
  • The EU isn't democratic. As opposed to national parliamentary democracies, the European parliament has barely any power compared to the commission which has no democratic legitimacy.

    It's as democratic as democratic gets on that scale.

    That is also completely false. There are numerous proposals that would make the EU more democratic, but that's obviously against the interest of the incumbent neoliberal elite.

  • Sorry for the snarky comment, I just personally don't see the need for meat shaped plant based products that cost 10 times what their ingredients would cost. To each their own though, still better than giving your money to the industrial meat industry.

  • Permanently Deleted

  • Lobbyists aren't inherently bad. The problem is lack of transparency and controls. Without effective controls of course a corporation with millions to spend will always have the upper hand over some NGO that lobbies for the common good.

  • That's wrong, first of all it's the central bank that controls money supply, which is independent from the government. In addition, even if the government could magically create all the money it needs to pay its debt, without borrowing more, it would completely devalue the dollar.

  • Unpopular take, wouldn't it be better to just not retaliate? We keep saying tariffs are dumb, they just hurt your own economy, consumers will pay the price. This is economically correct. So why impose tariffs ourselves and not let the orange ape destroy himself?

  • Void Linux @lemmy.ml
    ctrl_alt_esc @lemmy.ml
    voidlinux.org Introducing Void Linux: Enterprise Edition

    In today’s fast-paced digital landscape, businesses must continuously innovate to remain competitive and drive growth. That is why we are thrilled to unveil our latest solution, Void Linux: Enterprise Edition. Leveraging cutting-edge technology, this next-generation operating system offers unparalle...

    Introducing Void Linux: Enterprise Edition

    What do you think? April fools?

  • Thank you for the clarification! I indeed hadn't seen that disclaimer. I'm aware of the other public instances, I was just wondering why codeberg itself would host multiple.

    The reason I started noticing this is because I saw projects like https://code.forgejo.org/renovate/renovate which seems to have migrated to https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/forgejo-renovate, but the images are still only available on code.forgejo.org (or is it data.forgejo.org which is used for the image URLs in the repo?). I suppose if code.forgejo.org is for testing only, one also shouldn't pull images from its registry.

  • Forgejo @programming.dev
    ctrl_alt_esc @lemmy.ml

    The difference between forgejo and codeberg.org is clear. Forgejo is the software and codeberg is the entity that owns it, provides the domain name, etc. and also hosts a public forgejo instance at codeberg.org.

    Lately, I've seen that there is also code.forgejo.org, which I assume is run by the same people. Why are there two public instances run by the same organisation? Are users supposed to migrate from one to the other? I see that code.forgejo.org currently has version 11.0 deployed which afaik is not released yet, so is that instance just for testing purposes?