My point was more that I don't trust their motives.
Why is it they only have articles day of? It feels like they have a vested interest in making sure it is in public discourse without actually giving people any lead time.
I had a friend who excitedly told me about their new car but neglected to mention their 6 month old son.
I applaud this as a way to get more trans music recommendations.
Also, UgLi
Political views have long been met with state sanctioned violence. The concern for me with the breakdown of the judicial system, we're going to see an even wider disparity in equal application of the law, and larger backlogs.
I think in cases of long speeches, Grassley's desk is allowed to be used as a urinal.
There isn't some amount of transness you need to have to be worthy of the identifier. If you vibe with it, you're welcome to it, and if you don't feel like it accurately describes your journey, it's perfectly fine to not use it.
The "Hints of vanilla" make me think fem. Masc has more of an acrid, oniony undercurrent.
If his ratings are underwater, what are the odds we can get him to dive in after them?
Who is this meant to target exactly? Of the vanishingly small number of trans athletes, there's an even smaller number that would be traveling internationally.
Do you honestly think any of them have competing interests? The greedy ones stand to make money either way, and the ideologically driven ones are salivating at the idea of destroying the country if it means they could possibly steer a new government.
I personally, am dismayed that the democrats aren't fistfighting in congress.
The Department of Education is under the executive branch and holds control over policy and guidance. As a permanent change, it takes about 90 days to go through the official "We want to change eligibility policy" process, but until then, a presidential memo can serve as a directive to the department.
I like generic names for hacking groups like this. It could easily describe dozens of my friends and their polycules.
Not even a month in and the amount of BS thrown into the public's face has to exceed some sort of methane pollution limit.
It did, but they undid the limits on that too, probably.
They're only concerned with grinding it to a halt. Then they can point to a private sector solution that can be contracted in.
This can include invesigators' findings and interviews.
I mean, I'm all for deporting the US military, but what country would take them?