Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AH
aaro [they/them, she/her] @ aaro @hexbear.net

touch grass, eat ass, abolish class

Posts
0
Comments
20
Joined
5 yr. ago
  • The notion that any person can be "pure evil" in a way that is essential to their being implies the existence of some in-born quality stronger than any amount of their material conditions. This notion is both essentialist and anti-Marxist. Are Zionists evil? Yeah, but they're running the same hardware as you and I, their material conditions have just led them down this path that we have been able to avoid.

  • internalized transphobia does hit comrade but you are a girl

    We wouldn't call a cis woman any less of a woman if she never had that past of being subjected to the violence of patriarchy, and that aside, as a trans woman you have suffered the violence of the patriarchy in a way unique to womanhood. The thing that makes you a woman is that you are your truest self when you confidently align with womanhood, and however you choose to align with womanhood, you are your fullest, happiest, most authentic, and most alive self when doing so, even if you feel like you don't have your bearings quite yet and you're on unfamiliar ground for a bit.

    You're literally so valid and I have so much love for you and if you aren't in touch with what it takes for you to feel that in your heart yet then I hope me feeling that you're valid is enough for the both of us

  • you're so valid for that to be honest, most explanations of the difference are made with leftists in mind, and very few liberals know leftism 101 so very few explanations detailing the difference are written with liberals or new leftists in mind (because knowing leftism 101 makes you not want to be a liberal any more lol)

    The dividing line between leftists and liberals is most commonly agreed on as who should own the productive apparatus of society - liberals believe that individuals owning the apparatus necessary to sustain life, liberty, and happiness is fine, and leftists believe that the only ethical path forward is to make all of this apparatus collectively owned. The specific nature of this ownership, and how the ownership transfer should go down, varies a lot between anarchists, communists, Marxists, Democratic Socialists, etc., but we all agree that allowing an individual to own a means of production is a recipe for disaster.

  • our literal entire platform is that the people should work together as much as possible and efforts to divide the people should be met with the harshest punishment

    hundreds of thousands of volumes of literature spread across every nation, every language, every race, every gender, every sexuality, spanning centuries, and this is like the one thing we agree on the most

  • rejectetion of political plurality

    use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo

    reductions in the rule of law

    authoritarianism is characterized by reductions in the rule of law?? what???

    separation of powers

    and Democratic voting

  • Which political system do you suggest is more authoritarian than the owner of the largest military in the world, the largest police force in the world, and the largest intelligence (espionage) agency in the world?

  • I'm all for some good dunking, but this is the response that most clearly, patiently, and convincingly explains what the deal with Hexbear actually is. OP, we are also humans who have built our opinions on real information, both historical and modern - probably more than 99% of liberals - and you'd benefit as a human and a citizen of the world to make a good faith effort to understand us.