Glad to hear there are only 2 Nazis in the US and no supporters. I guess I'll go tell all of the skinheads and proud boys in my city that they aren't real

I can't imagine anyone who purchased a cyber truck is unaware of what Musk is doing, so they are at least complicit in all of this. We aren't talking about vandalizing 8 year old model 3s, this is about people who purchased an 80+ thousand dollar hunk of sheet metal after Musk went full mask-off with his beliefs

Oh, I'm so glad that you only disagree with Elon and haven't been personally affected by fascist takeover. Let me know once you wake the fuck up so we can have a real discussion on if it's okay to vandalize vehicles owned by Nazi supporters.

You know most people don't take out a loan to buy a 6 figure vanity vehicle. If you purchased a Nazi truck, you had this coming

Are we talking additive or subtractive color? If additive then yellow is the secondary of green and red, and magenta the secondary of blue and red

Probably just due to covid lockdowns. Emissions have been steadily increasing since

https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissions/

Cyan is a primary color when working subtractively, but for additive color the primaries are RGB. Since this is on a screen, green and blue would be the relevant primaries

They never said they don't give a shit, they're clearly happy that the broken clock was right this time of day. Nobody is praising EA as a company, but this one particular action they have taken is pretty based

Do you have a source for this? I've only seen and heard of bots in quick play matches

If you don't want to use glue, I've found that a quick wipe with IPA will remove surface oils and help prints stick to the build plate

This is only the case if you're getting stomped in quick play. Comp matches don't have bots fortunately and I've had plenty of close games

Does it say a trial must be completed for him to be removed? Or does it say he must be presented with charges?

Did you forget he was presented with charges and the opportunity to defend himself before Trump ordered the case dismissed?

In NYC mayors can't be impeached. The only legal way to remove a mayor in NY is by action of the govorner. You keep acting like we are calling for imprisonment here, but this is literally the correct legal process to remove a corrupt mayor. By not removing him, the govorner is acting against the rule of law you seem to be so concerned about. It is more authoritarian to think he deserves to stay mayor despite betraying his people.

https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/newyorkcity/latest/NYCcharter/0-0-0-5717

And who exactly denied him the right to defend himself? IIRC it was Trump that ordered these charges to be dropped, and who knows what Adams got in return. It's not like people are asking the NY govorner to send him to prison. He is a civil servant and there is a legal process already in place to remove corrupt mayors that is not being followed. Why are you licking the boots of the oligarchs so hard?

Is the law being more closely followed by letting him remain in office despite taking bribes? I suppose in your opinion Trump is perfectly fine to do whatever he wants now that the "rule of law" says that he can.

no matter how compelling the evidence is.

That's where we disagree. If there's plenty of evidence then we can't always wait on our justice system where the rich and powerful can use their resources to stall almost indefinitely. In this case, he will likely serve the remainder of his term without any repercussions.

Yes? Don't you think Trump should have been removed from office in his first term?

Yes, because if there's anything the last 10 years of politics has taught us is that the Democrats need to care more about precedent than holding elected officials accountable

I work at a bank and it's mind boggling how often I encounter systems very similar to this. A signed PDF isn't good enough but send it via fax and suddenly it's secure 🙄