My entire premise hinges on the fact that these papers agree with me.
I work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too.
I'm not concerned with what you think is "objective truth" when you have no idea what you're talking about.
Yes this is an argument in my favor, you just don't understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.
People break laws all the time. That doesnt mean the gov supports them.
You may enjoy learning about the actual nuance here
https://israelpolicyforum.org/west-bank-settlements-explained/
That's certainly an opinion you have
I don't care if he likes to be peed on or whatever, but seriously try to imagine saying this to someone
she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her ‘pert nipples’,” she testified.
the people stealing data
No one is doing this
Output doesn’t matter since it’s pretty well settled it’s not derivative work
Cool, discussion over.
I agree. For instance, it should be secured in law that you can train AI on anything, to avoid frivolous discussions like this.
Output is what should be moderated by law.
If it's not a violation of copyright then this is a non-issue. You don't need permission to read books.
Yet Israeli settlers are free to harass Palestinians and force them from their homes without consequence
That's simply not true
Meanwhile Hamas literally has in their original charter that the reason they exist was to form an Islamic state, resist PA secularism, and fight a two state solution, because their goal was genocide of Israel.
at their expense
How?
Why do you have free reign to do the same?
AIs don’t learn as a human would, and comparisons can’t be made between the learning processes.
I think you're going to have a hard time proving a financial distinction between them
There's a third solution you're overlooking.
3: OpenAI (or other) wins a judgment that AI content is not inherently a violation of copyright regardless of materials it is trained upon.
Hamas only exists because peaceful diplomacy with Israel was successful, and leading to a secular Palestinian state and a two state solution.
As this wasn't a terrorist attack, a closer analogue is a recent war.
One estimate puts civilian casualties in the Battle of Mosul at around 40,000
I could definitely see Trump supporters doing shit like this. I find it unlikely anyone at the Capitol, who has also been prosecuted, and given a light sentence, doing it again.
Aggressive prosecution is the precisely how you don’t let it happen again.
This has literally never been true about any crime
Are you for real.
Yes, Republicans notably used those riots to demand harsher penalties. You don't remember the mythical burning cities?
This current melt is also due to localized factors, like the El Nino event we are going through, making the climate-change-induced ice reduction greatly exacerbated. Ice on the Great Lakes has been declining for 50 years.
Just as no Congressperson should be bringing in snow alls to refute climate change, we should also keep in mind that weather and climate are vastly different things.
Remember to bring this up in a couple years when Republicans are talking about how the ice is back so climate change isn't real.
This is "gold fringe on the American flag" level of nonsense