'General purpose computing device' has been referred in prior legal documents to mean:
"means any general purpose computing device
Great, general computing device means general computing device. Brilliant.
Then you come with the requirement of a monitor.... Why? That's not on the definition. And isn't a router a server product? Servers generally don't need a monitor
Docker or git are not distributing extensions, and on Linux docker doesn't run on a separate host application, unless you bend the meaning of containers to the point of nonsense. I'm curious about the reasoning for git.
From what you said, only jellifin is excluded in my example.
I'm not trying to convince anybody, just explain the current and potential future issues.
Because there's an explicit bias in your questioning. You wouldn't question if I'm really cis-hetero, but you would question of I'm reeeeeeeeally gay or trans, even thought I'm sure there are more people who come up publicly as gay after having children than there are trans detransitioning.
This is the same as the maga mentality, where any man in a position of responsibility is accepted by default, but for women they demand justification for the role.
The only problem have with this is that it should only apply to commercial software (app stores and 0S). Libre/FOS software should not have to police ages on their app stores,
It's a bit like saying the only problem with the Titanic is the water inside.
The law is bad, whether it can be worse or not is just tangential. But still, this law as is applies to computers, phones... And nas, some routers, watches, advance calculators... As they all have OS and can install apps. As per app stores, guess what, thats the GNOME app store, but also flatpak, jellyfin (can install apps as plugins), pip, docker, git... And what about plain executables? Githut should ask for your age too to download artifacts?
Porn started with only age verification by the user as a prompt, and we see where that is going now.
They don't want some profit, or even sustainable profit. They want all the profit, and always more this quarter than the previous.
I do understand that if somebody created something that is cheap, lasts forever and there's a limited (non infinite) need for it, they would eventually stop selling. That's why they need to make things last less, or invent excuses to make you buy a new one.
I've not used Ubuntu based since pop 22.04, so sorry for the misinformed question. What's the user facing issue with snap? I know the repos are solely managed by Ubuntu, but I didn't have any issue I could attribute to snap. Actually I liked it had terminal app support, not only graphical ones like flatpak (last I checked at least)
I use an immutable distro that only refreshes when booting, so yeah pretty much every night my desktop and the server updates when there's a power outage I guess.
Well, that's a way to go from having a bias to just plain bigotry.