Just note that filters like "ICE" block every post with a word in it that contains those letters. You can prevent false positives by adding spaces on both sides of the word but then it doesn't trigger if the post title starts or ends with that word. Either way it helps a lot. Half of the threads on my personal front page regularly get filtered out.
If you have a miscalibrated bubble level on a truly level surface, the bubble will sit more toward one side - say, left. Flip it 180 degrees, and it'll shift to the right.
On an inclined surface, the level might read level one way and show incline the other way.
Here you could just adjust the screw until the bubble stays in the exact same spot no matter which way you flip the level.
You can use the same method you already used to check accuracy in the first place. It doesn't even need a level surface - just make sure the bubble sits exactly the same distance from the lines when you flip the level the other way around.
Regularly inhaling combustion fumes is bad for your health no matter how you try to rationalize it. Yeah, more smoke is worse than less, and not all smoke is equally toxic - but it's all bad and should be avoided.
First you moved the goalposts by pivoting from "there's no want for LLMs" to "okay but how many are paying." You quietly shifted the entire criteria of "want" from voluntary demand to monetization the second evidence of massive adoption showed up.
When I pointed out that VLC has hundreds of millions of users who also don't pay, you tossed in the irrelevant "it's open source by one person" line - which is a complete non sequitur. Development model or monetization status has zero logical bearing on whether 800 million weekly ChatGPT users demonstrate real desire for LLMs.
This is classic bad-faith argumentation: throw in red herrings, change the standard whenever your position weakens, and misrepresent what was actually said to avoid engaging with the actual evidence.
I just tell people not to read into it. I don't even claim to forget - because I don't. I simply don't casually check in when I have nothing important to say.
You might not hear from me for six months, but when you finally do, I act like we just talked yesterday.
When pictures get compressed, the data is lost. It's not hidden - it's gone forever.
When you "increase the quality" with a tool like this, you're not recovering lost data - you're making up new data to fill in the gaps. It takes an intelligent system to figure out what should probably be there and then add it convincingly.
Many of them falsely think that Santa Claus lives on the north pole.
That's wrong because Santa Claus doesn't exist.