

![Lyudmila [she/her, comrade/them]](https://lazysoci.al/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhexbear.net%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F1e78abb3-ef38-484d-a0d4-c0c47c826530.webp&format=webp&thumbnail=128)
"Take Chances. Make Mistakes. Get Messy."
Hexbear's fourth grade teacher, taking the class on adventures and defeating misogyny, racism, and misanthropy.

Getting away with the tariffs nuking the economy by saying a bunch of irresistibly wild nonsense to distract the media.

I typically just don't bother with content unless it's complete. Sonarr and Radarr are really handy, but I have fewer than 5 currently running shows in my 9TB plex library.
Streaming services are a graveyard of cancelled TV shows, painfully mediocre movies, and reality TV.
E: The 5 shows are Severance, Foundation, The Rehearsal, Invincible, and Andor

Typically the shockingly, impossibly cheap stuff like $30 ebikes are scam listings, or the price per unit for a large order of dozens or hundreds of ebikes.

It is easier to imagine the end of the North American tectonic plate than the end of capitalism.

Incredible. This is them sending their best.


Seriously good shitposting here, the site has been so caught up over one of the lowest energy trolls of all time (Melina) and the unfiltered posting of half-finished bits in badposting.
Really satisfying to see a high effort shitpost like this. You almost had me going up until the son passed his mom the 黄雪 note. o7 Thanks for the laughs, comrade peepants!

Even funnier, the KJV is Anglican, the Catholic Church has never used it.
Cain isn't so bad

Are you not also a Christian? If not, how would you describe your faith?
Cain isn't so bad

By "lovers of God," you wouldn't happen to be referring to Jews, would you?
Cain isn't so bad

You're suggesting that your statement is self-evident. You need to cite specific named and numbered passages which back up your claim explicitly, not implicitly.
In which passage does the Bible say or even allude to Moses suffering the curse of Cain?
Thebetween both wandering is certainly interesting to draw, but it's a just a parallel, not evidence. You've discovered literary symbolism at best.
Do you purport to have unique, divine knowledge of the scripture that supersedes all other interpretation?
Cain isn't so bad

I'm familiar, I'm trying to determine which biblical translation are you using? What specific version of the text are you working with?
Don't pretend you're fluent in Rabbinical Hebrew or Aramaic.
Cain isn't so bad

I think there's two misunderstandings here, coming from syntactic ambiguity. Lemme try to break it down.
It's the descendents of angels who mated with women who plagued the world with evil.
It was angels who mated with human women. It was their descendants who plagued the world with evil.
This is a somewhat common but wrong interpretation of Nephilim, from Bereshit 6:4. Better interpretation and translation can make an incredible difference, especially when compared to the nonsense cooked up by a bunch of dudes in the 16th century who had no access to any of the original texts or even direct translations of the original text.
Rashi's interpretation and the JPS 1917 translation are really well respected, and I'll take their understanding of the original text to be far more accurate than anyone working with one of the dozens of awful translation telephone nightmares based on the Septuagint or Vulgate, like any of the Catholic Bibles, King James Version, or Geneva Bible. Even most of the English translated Christian Bibles that claim to use the Masoretic Text absolutely don't. If someone is interpreting Genesis 4:6 as meaning the children of angels, they've either got a bad Septuagint based translation, or they're Randall.

(Somehow, chabad.org still has the easiest to read digital torah with Rashi's commentary. In spite of it all, the techbros at Sefaria just haven't succeeded at reinventing the wheel in this regard.)
Cain isn't so bad

I'm saying that Moses is Cain reincarnated.
This statement is considered heretical, derived from early esotericist cults like the Gnostics and Manichaeists. Christianity explicitly rejects the concept of reincarnation. Hebrews 9:27, "And just as it is appointed for men to die once, and after that comes judgment," explicitly states that people die only once. The Apostle's Creed, one of the most foundational statements of Christian belief, is a personal covenant Christians of all denominations make with God asserting your rejection of those heretical esoteric beliefs.
The concept of reincarnation is not now, and never has been compatible with or permissible in any form of Christianity. There are in fact no religious communities within any of the Abrahamic religions that validate or accept reincarnation.
Cain isn't so bad

you people

Cain isn't so bad

In Talmudic or Biblical hermeneutics, the burden of proof is both mandatory and always on the individual offering scriptural exegesis. Look to the dialectical format of sugyot in the Gemara for examples of this.
It is your responsibility to cite significant specific and explicit evidence for your claims from elsewhere in the original text and/or from earlier interpretation. You never just get to say that the exegetical claims you are presenting are the literal word of God, your job is to provide a clear narrative using only extant sources.
Cain isn't so bad

Could you please cite the passage(s) you're referencing here?

I think it's definitely not as well written or produced as Jordan Peele's films, and that tracks with his involvement being mostly as presenter. It's definitely better than the 2002 TZ reboot.
If you like Black Mirror, you'll have a good time with it. Worth the price of admission ($0, but probably like 10 gigs of torrent downloads)

why are there so few cis women?
The explanation that used to go around was that it was because we started as a lifeboat from a subreddit. Reddit has disproportionately few cis women who are disproportionately likely to only post in female-majority subreddits.
However, it's been way too long since we were a subreddit for that to still be the reason for the underrepresentation on Hexbear, especially considering that there have been multiple large user influxes since then.
I have some kinda complex thoughts on this, but I think it's site culture related and there's been a lot of user pushback to change in that regard.

Yeah, absolutely despicable shit from the feddit.uk admins.
It should go without saying that there was no need for a discussion for our instance. Hexbear admins were already in unilateral agreement that transphobic content isn't acceptable.

I'm sure this was unintentional but this comment has this energy:
