Please continue to call us "tankies" for saying things like "resistance to genocide is good". I'm not joking, you're doing free propaganda for us "tankies".
Oh, my apologies. It's totally better if you're a different type of gentile genocide enjoyer lecturing a Jewish man about his own people in order to support a settler colony. /s
You’re not interested in humanity, you’re only interested in labels. It’s sad and evil.
Excuse me if I'm not concerned with a zionist's opinion about "humanity".
You’re a fundamentalist extremist and a hateful human. Be better.
Finnish genocide enjoyer lectures a Jewish man about how he's hateful for objecting to his culture being used as a shield for colonialism. Almost reads like parody.
It’s like you don’t even read my comments, just default to “wah, wah, wah, you’re a colonialism denier, wah, wah, wah!”
I read your comments denying genocide, that's why I reply by calling you a genocide denier. I have explained over and over, but you don't believe colonialism is genocidal because you are a genocide denier. It seems you also don't even believe colonialism is colonialism.
There’s no reason to continue this conversation in this context.
I agree, I'm not sure why I even bothered to reply to an obvious genocidal zionist for so long.
"Israel" is a colony because it was founded by European settlers who OPENLY proclaimed that fact. They gladly and openly bragged that they were displacing and massacring the native Palestinians to colonize the region. All your bullshit about "Israelis" "roaming" is historical revisionism meant to justify the Nakba, which is a genocide. Ashkenazim are Europeans.
Settler colonialism requires the displacement and elimination of at least the vast majority of the native population to succeed, it is genocidal by nature. You are a genocide supporter and a genocide denier.
Where did I deny colonialism? I acknowledge the fact that Israel is occupying (and colonising) the West Bank and Gaza, I firmly believe they should be pushed out and forced to pay reparations for the decades of stealing land and killing Palestinians.
You literally deny colonialism in the sentence after asking where you deny it. "Israel" is a settler colony in its entirety, not just in the West Bank and Gaza. Once again, Ben Gurion, who committed the Nakba, was very clear about this. So was Herzl, the main forefather of the "Israeli" state.
Israelis vs Israelites might come from language barrier. English is not my native language.
But saying they're not native to the region when we have archaeological and historical evidence of them being there over 3000 years ago is either extreme ignorance, or fundamentalist extremism.
"Israelis" are the modern day settlers. "Israelites" are the ancient people. "Israelis" are not native to the region. They are mainly europeans, as well as Arab Jews from elsewhere in West Asia and North Africa. Palestinians are native to the region and are descendants of the Israelites who never left.
Explain to me, how are you not a proponent of genocide if you want to eliminate a nation?
Telling that you can't separate a nation that was founded as a settler colony less than 80 years ago from its entire population.
So, it's not about "Israelis vs Palestinians", or wider, "Israelis vs Arabs". It's just literally about the establishment of Israel as a nation? That's it?
It's about colonialism, which is exactly "Israelis" (colonizers) vs. Palestinians (the native people). Again, people like Ben Gurion and Herzl were extremely open about this.
The only one here who is a proponent of genocide is you, because you support colonialism and colonialism is genocidal.
Ah, OK, so you’re just refuting the idea that Israelites have lived there, in that very same region, for thousands of years, for which we have archaeological and historical data? All of that is a hoax? Like, an Egyptian dude was going “LOL, let’s write those guys in, hilarity will ensue 3000 years later”?
Yes, their descendants are called Palestinians today. This also has nothing to do with the fact that the current conflict is 100 years old and not 1000 or thousands.
Wow, maybe if you elaborated on what you meant, like I asked, then I’d understand what you meant better? Weird how communication works, eh?
I don't know how much clearer I can make it: this "conflict" is a hundred years old and you are distorting history to support colonialism. The "Israelis" are settlers, the Palestinians are the native population, descended in part from the people "Israelis" claim falsely to be the continuation of. The creators and forefathers of the "Israeli" state, people like Ben Gurion and Herzl, were open about the colonial nature of their project.
Yes, the genocide is a recent thing considering the Palestinian population has been steadily growing, while their culture was not in any danger of being wiped out.
lmao, Nakba AND colonialism denial. Excellent.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, they’re out to get you right after they’ve finished eating their newborn babies. WTF are you smoking,
More colonialism denial.
Yeah, it's all just colonialism denial. You are a genocidal colonialism supporter. No amount of calling "Israelis" "Israelites" to pretend they're native to the region and not colonizers will make it true.
I love how you guys call me a "genocide defender" after I've stated so many times that Netanyahu and everybody responsible for the genocide should be tried and eliminated. :D
You think this is because of Netanyahu and that this genocide is a recent thing? This genocide is inherent to the state of "Israel", which is a settler colony. If you believe "Israel" should exist, you are a genocide defender.
You're exactly like MAGA - a fundamentalist who believes that if someone isn't 100% committed to ALL tenets of your cause, they're a traitor and an enemy. This tribalism is pathetic and a cancer on our society.
No, I just think people who think colonialism is acceptable are enemies. Because you are.
I refuted the idea that this is a thousand year conflict by pointing out that it is a colonial occupation (which began in the last 100 years). None of the bullshit you're spewing has anything to do with that.
Liberals love to call it infighting because it allows them to take credit for all the progress that happened thanks to leftists. And yet they're always on the right-wing side of those "infights".
