You could call it c/puzzlemethis, maybe. It'd sound like "riddle me this" so the purpose is pretty easy to figure out, but it also says that this isn't just riddles.

Luckily my model of other people's model of me has lost enough genuine character that it's more of a trope so my model of someone else's model of me has like 3 models that apply to everyone and that's so reductive I ignore them.

Here's the text.

"Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust, or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."

Impeachment is important and it should've happened, but the senate literally can't do anything except remove him from office, and the impeachment text specifically allows for regular law to also apply to whoever got impeached.

So no, we do not have this covered by impeachment, and no former president is immune from regular legal proceedings.

Current presidents are, though, through supreme court precedent and the self-pardon. Former presidents should not automatically get this benefit though.

They're gonna flap around too but nah this is leg day. Flying starts with a big jump. Especially when the wings are also new, you want as much height as you can when you start.

Maybe but if so it's a shame, so someone still failed.

No.

Of course even the president has a right to due process, but no. If the president commits treason, he doesn't get to be immune to that. A trial is warranted and an arrest if found guilty is correct.

Yes, corruption could hypothetically rig such a trial. But a president immune from the consequences of his actions means there only needs to be one person corrupted to ruin a whole branch of government, instead of the hundreds it would take Congress to rig a trial.

Zigbee is a mesh network, but Zigbee with mqtt has a hub that stores messages. I haven't used it myself but it would mean that if, say, a Zigbee bulb was routing a message on the mesh network through a smart switch across the room to the hub, and the switch dropped the connection for a moment, a hub reply could be dropped entirely. Just briefly, but thatd be the intermittent issues that people are describing here.

MQTT stores all those messages in the hub though and makes the light bulb check in to get the messages, so if a light bulb were to do that and the switch disconnected, the light bulb would notice the failure and just retry, and the message is still on the mqtt hub to be redelivered.

Dunno if this description is exactly correct, but it sounds like it from my brief look on Wikipedia on communication differences.

No that seems likely.

Evidence that would damn them here being in a court record makes it admissible elsewhere for a crime that isn't even prosecuted yet.

They're cutting off their foot to save their leg, here, since this isn't particularly secretive, seeing how we know about it.

Companies don't get jail time.

Sure, technically an individual could, but generally the actual destruction is an employee doing what they're told to do. They're somewhat complicit but the real problem is the c-suite people.

I unfortunately don't know when this last happened or any specific details on what the penalty would be, but I feel fairly confident that this law falls under the "cost of doing business" part of illegal corporate activity. I wish it didn't.

The previous Pedro Pascal, I guess.

Nah it's illegal to deliberately destroy data to impede investigations. You don't need to have an open investigation for that to be the case.

It remains legal to get rid of old files to free up space or if you genuinely believe they aren't necessary, though, so you need to prove intent.

If there's a subpeona or something, their destruction is itself a crime, but under this law, its the intent to defraud the courts that's illegal, and that intent is always illegal.

The law exists specifically for this situation. Purging important business documents preemptively is clearly not OK.

Citation: https://legalclarity.org/18-u-s-c-1519-destruction-alteration-or-falsification-of-records/

Well clearly the dog was religious and preferred to eat things that were free of sin.

Crossbow would be better than a bow I feel. You can load your shot preemptively, like a gun, but it isn't a gun.

Honestly I think of bluejays and the rest of the family as crows, too. They're the blue crows. Crows are true crows, but magpies and bluejays and all them are still crows, to me.

I appreciate it. I knew this, but external reminders are more powerful.

Clearly the gravity capacitors are aligned in such a way that in the case of gravity failure, the outer gravitronic shell fails first, causing the neutronium to evacuate safely in the direction of anyone else, while the inner shell maintains for a second or so longer, preventing an implosion.

That, and transporter shenanigans. They just beam up the neutronium before shutdown.

Well thats what the artificial gravity is for.

They also use it for walking and whatnot, of course, but that's an add-on. The real purpose is so they can siphon off some neutron star stuff and hold it between them and an enemy without it exploding.

Email group

Magic Fang (Runic Body in the remaster) is Magic Weapon/Runic Weapon for unarmed strikes.

Even if you found some cheesy way to make an attack count for both, it's the exact same thing, simulated runes, so it couldn't stack and gives an item bonus that doesn't stack with real runes like the AI wanted. Three different sources, all just item runes.

They have actually started doing that already. At least musk has.