Oh shit, I misread. Thought it banned social media from implementing addicting algorithms. Whoopsie

Wait… a bill from Florida that isn’t malicious? Someone pinch me.

I don’t think they meant the individuals are always selfish, more that the whole culture (and thus the lack of public transport) exists because of selfishness and fear.

Also in countries which are not as reliant on cars most people still have access to a car, they just use it less often.

Boss music starts playing

Or they should be made so expensive that they only make sense when there really is no alternative.

just plow a field and find out, it's simple really.

'it’s not perfect so we can’t' is absolutely not the 'dumbest fucking' argument if we are talking about actual human lives.

How low of a human being must you be to claim evidence has been destroyed when it hasn't. The cop who told that under oath should be fired and put in jail, like anyone else would.

Yea but how are they going to extinguish an non-centralized social network?

but the poor politicians need to make some money. /s

I agree it's a stupid company, but I don't see why we should work against them if they finally decide to so something kinda good.

We build this entire reddit alternative without interconnectivity with reddit, why couldn't we do that again if threads decides to do that. People will be familiar with how lemmy works and there will be no ads here, so I don't completely see a problem. Plus the format of lemmy is completely different from threads right?

Another layer to their technique, you just don't understand.

It's about 24% of the userbase according to this comment: https://lemmy.world/comment/6148151

How would they control it? If they do anything bad we can just defederate, right?

Is threads that bad?

Wonder how d-day’s going…

Unfortunately we are at a stage where it's rare for a phone to have it.

My phone is to expensive to have expendable storage.

https://lemmy.world/post/9360157