Digit

All the time

All the time.

Yup.

It's for sure not just the breeding.

The chemical lobotomies are doing far worse. The lead, the fluoride, the mercury, the aluminium, the glyphosate, the hyper sugars, the pro-inflamatory oils and residues, the aspartame / aminosweet, the ascesulfame-K, the sucralose, the alcohol, the food dyes, the detergents, the fragrances, the ~~chemstrails~~ "geoengineering" chemicals, the shit on TV and tiktok sortening attention spans, the dumbing-down in the "education" system, on and on it goes...

Tackle breeding alone, with this kind of phenomic weight, I'm not sure you'll get the best genome out the other side. ... Nor have adequate means to measure or determine whatever's the best criteria for whatever eugenics program's presented by whichever's the strongest big bully to take power in the absence of many capable minds to resist, from all the chemical lobotomies.

Remember Eisenhower's warning?

Remember JFK?

The hour may be later than you think.

Best not fall for the pantomime. When they put the puppets away, it's still going on.

Yeah, why wont they stop punching themselves in the face. Nothing to do with the bully holding their arms making them do it.

Glad to offer you something that correctly fulfils the request, in that it garners a "controversial" voting score here. (up 2, down 3, so far).

[Edit: And there's stiff competition here.]

This won’t help the poor countries, they will have the technological knowledge but not the budget. All it will do is give billionaires the ability to travel to some far-off planet, like Elon Mu… you know what, I agree.

Something's gone wrong here. Sounds like responding to something completely different, and/or did not deeply grasp what was said.

All the suppressed and secreted emancipatory technologies should be released, giving everybody interstellar spaceships of their own, in as little time as an afternoon.

This won’t help the poor countries

...? But... all the emancipatory technologies have been released, giving everybody interstellar spaceships of their own.

How would that not help?

How would they still be poor?

Would we even still have countries?

I'm struggling to get my head around that reply.

All it will do is give billionaires the ability to travel to some far-off planet, like Elon Mu… you know what, I agree.

Was it all just a set up for the joke? And that's why it does not make sense?

Because if everybody has their own spaceships, and all the emancipatory technologies have been released, we're in the transcendent realms of egalitarian abundance there. Who cares what Elon Mu' does. How would it be "All it will do" is something to billionaires (... would "billionaires" have any meaning any more?), when we've all abundance ("billionaires" included) far in excess of what billionaires had. We can each travel to some far-off planet.

... And they've been suppressing this technology for about 100-200 years!

Think about that, look into it, and as you do, let it hit you hard in the face, the horror... all those resource wars, all those mass starvations, all the genocides, all the mass poisonings, all the mutilations and interferences in our lives, all the human culls, all, for all this time, unnecessary.

Follow the tech arc from Michael Faraday through to Nikola Tesla (just the most showy and loud of countless innovators of the time), including worth stopping by the Sonora Aero Club (and Charles Dellschau's 1850's drawings), and the bell and foo-fighters, and it starts becoming less implausible sounding, the assertions that we could have done this in the 1930s. Spaceships for everybody.

Yeah. Wild how much emancipatory technology has been suppressed for generations. Cannabis, AKA Hemp, is just the tip of the agnotological iceberg of abuse. ... Bloody Anslinger & Hearst, (learning from the same book Hitler did, Ed Bernays' crystallising public opinion), telling us our best friend, the plant with a thousand uses, is instead a demon called marijuana that will make your white daughters be raped by n******s, and other kinds of monstrous things, turning ourselves against each other in fear, thinking we were involved in necessary virtues. If they could convince so many, for so long, that Cannabis, the main stuff of civilisation (food, fuel, fiber, medicine and more), was instead our enemy, and we had to instead use their inferior, more expensive, less empowering alternatives... think what they could do for things that have not been with us for tens of thousands of years. Think how much easier the agnotology industry has it when they're not having to re-write millenia, but mere decades, of history.

Anyway, my usual rants about that, aside. When all the emancipatory technologies are de-secreted, availed, provisioned (as easily they can be once we have access to them), it won't matter what Musk or any other billionaire's plotting any more (at least... on the grand scale. Still though... probably don't leave your children with them.), as we will all have the means to remedy whatever ills born of the manufactured scarcity and economic imbalance that was maintained to keep us down and dependent and eager to be a slave. All that's done. Total paradigm change.

And I do not understand why (though have experienced) this is taken as so controversial. Like... is it a sameness-comfort thing? Like it's too much of a change to be comfortable with? Is that not just why such things are suppressed, but why people are not up at arms about the suppression? People would rather be slaves? ... Is that more of Ed Bernays' work I detect there? Identify with your job, and your whole worth being your usefulness as a slave... That kind of mind games gone on? That kind of governing of minds? We could have spaceships for everybody. Why's there not a political party for that? Prefer some incrementalism? Just slightly better treatment for the slaves, oh please sir, may I have some more? Some seem find it a controversial idea, saying there's too much hate in the world to give that much power to everybody, like we'd all blow up the world, turning them fullspeed crashing... like they don't realise that's like the string-door argument.

Why can't we have spaceships? Because the string-doors don't work in space. That's the string-door argument. Towit the obvious response is "well don't build them like that!". Safe enough for a 2 year old to fly home in, I hear. These things exist. By human innovation. The way I understand it, is, that once you have zero inertia propulsion, safety stopping's easy. Hefty safety margin, when you can stop from FTL in the space of an electron, and not feel the bump, ~ and the outer field has you stop far quicker than any solid object getting a chance to bump anyway. ... And they can print another of themselves, instantly. Imagine, How easy that makes proliferating them. Each and all of us can make as many spaceships for all friends, family, neighbours, passers-by, anyone, anywhere, anytime.

And they were making working prototypes with the beginnings of zero-inertia propulsion in the 1800s! Not just the late 1800s! Not even merely middle of the 1800s, I presume, since the aero-clubs didn't come from nowhere, presumably decades earlier yet.

But then we all suffered propaganda, having our opinions, our perceptions, moulded, made ignorant of what we'd lost. ... Such that to bring it up, seems controversial. ... Or even just dismissed as implausible. Too far from the naive-realist believed "reality" narrative. Best just mock and jeer at the crazy man. "Zero point energy? Sounds like there's zero point to it. Hah."

Quite the catastrophizing there. I sympathise. I too have CPTSD [Edit: incidentally, in part, from nearly being democided by Nazis]. Much to heal yet.

It's plausible Daryl Davis's contacts could proliferate better ideas within the system, since they'll know many more nazis yet. Flexes the degrees of separation, see? More opportunities to spread the seeds of curiosity to dispel the ignorant hate. Flaps the butterfly wings to make storms around the world. Handy to have that "work smarter" tool in the toolbox.

I'm not sure why you want to dissuade from having such in the toolbox. It seems a better win, to not just end a Nazi, but gain an ally. And it's not like killing Nazis has a de-Nazifying effect on the Nazi's loved ones. More likely to make them double down, for violent vengeance, contributing to the escalating cycle of reciprocal violence and the psychology to dominate. Might not be the best way. Lucky the toolbox holds more than just a hammer. ... A hammer that may as well be labelled Nazi, with which to end Nazis by. I'm not sure if out-Nazi'ing Nazi's even gets us less Nazis. Just different ones.

Would like to know more about the figures... like who's managing to end more Nazis than Daryl Davis has, and using what method, to what type of results?

And to what level of which abilities required... so that perhaps more people can contribute. Because I doubt many people have it in them to be a rifleman at the wall. ... And how do we get the Nazis to the wall? We're to use the rule of law, and not just a rabid witch hunt for anyone who an accuser has a grievance of? I thought that system was already raddled with them. This hammer's getting fiddly to wield, once thinking it through past the immediate angry catharsis of the idea.

Or could use Gentoo, only using the more unstable keywords for packages you want to be newer than old stable.

Best of both paths in one.

... Though... Do enjoy the increasing dependency wrangling, the more you mix and match.

Yeah, but,

antisemitic

can we stop that^ misnomer mislead

and especially cease using the psyop ad-hominem phrase designed to dissuade scrutiny:

conspiracy theorist

because that^^'s too much Orwellian conflationary fly-in-the-ointment poisoned-well dog-whistling noise in the signal.

Maybe.

Or 2.

Cave leaving's not the real problem.

And the things I hoard are useful and not shiny.

All the suppressed and secreted emancipatory technologies should be released, giving everybody interstellar spaceships of their own, in as little time as an afternoon.

In theory I still do.

In practice, so rare I basically don't.

Top reason: Operating systems.

Secondary reason: Backup artwork or research.

But, no, I don't. I've been lax. Pendrives and big drive on hand.

Would be good to get back to some DVD backups of important things.

Well if it's working for the Ukraine. ...

Yep.

It's not a phrase I use, because of that dangerous ambiguity. [And because that's not necessarily a solution either.]

...Especially considering how psyop'd and terrorised Israelis, especially the Israeli Jewish population, already are. That fire needs less fuel, not more.

Best not fumble our way into exacerbating the danger with accidental crying ourselves wolves, when there are real wolves both among them and against them.

[Has worked quite well for me. Though I couldn't put numbers on it, like Daryl Davis can. They're not pigeons. That's a flawed analogy, only further revealing your confirmation bias and dehumanising prejudice.]

I guess we should tell Daryl Davis to stop too, similarly citing the past years of having doing so proving to work well, and just continue to dehumanise and smear those he'd speak to, as beyond help, and ignore the hundreds he's converted from the KKK and Nazi party, by just talking with them.

Or... maybe try it, persistently, non-hostile, not becoming them, not reaffirming their noxious combative ways back to them, instead of just hatefully dehumanising them, instead of reaffirming to them that they are their rotten ideas, instead of censoring and isolating and banning them to their echo chamber and you to yours, instead of all that polarising groupthink nonsense, just keep exposing them to better ways of being, and seeing that neither you, nor any of the targets of their misguided hate, are the monsters they imagine in their ignorance.

Every non-human species is speciesist!?

And I wholeheartedly apologise for my small part in that, having worked in advertising [(until Bill Hicks saved me)].

I was "just doing my job", to the best of my abilities, for my client. Maximally manipulating minds... And that was about 25 years ago, before all the datamining cold-reading hypno tech these days. Me and my guy, our meagre team of two, with our non-existent budget, we changed the culture... Now imagine what those with the tech today, and the budget of billions and trillions could do to people... Especially those who are completely oblivious and not actively trying to avoid the manipulations.

They'll deprive you of all wealth, and all free volition, if given a chance.

I twisted nothing.

You're moving the goal posts.

The same people who claimed "Death to Israel" wasn't a call for genocide last week, are now calling for genocide against Israel openly.

Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio
Up 32 Down 2 Vor 5 Stunden
I hope, somehow israel gets absolutely glassed over all this bullshit

did not mention anything of the .ml and other stuff you're adding here:

On .ml most of those who were saying they don’t support genocide are now calling for genocide because of Iran. Stop trying to twist my words.

If you can't say what you mean, you can't mean what you say. ;D I wonder what yet may be revealed of what you mean.

I wonder if you consider that any kind of refutation [to what I said] or retraction [of what you said], to have offered that. Seemed a mite "ego social-dominance"y and gaslighty and misdirectiony and deflectiony. n_n

it sounds like you are analyzing how the historical conditions of people’s upbringing affects each generations’ behaviors and mannerisms.

I do not know how it sounds like that to you. Seems a strong non sequitur. Maybe I'm missing something. Care to elaborate how you made this leap?

I think you had the better version straight out of the gate.

Digit

@ Digit @lemmy.wtf

Posts

14
Comments

2037
Joined

2 yr. ago

techno hippie
see c/UGEM for UnderGroundElectronicMusic. :) (I was going to set up something like that when saw someone else had already requested to make it. Good stuff. Populate it.)

Digit

All the time

What’s your most controversial opinion?

What’s your most controversial opinion?

What’s your most controversial opinion?

What’s your most controversial opinion?

What’s your most controversial opinion?

What's with users of fediverse using 'Go back to reddit' as a retort to other users?

Live Dangerously

Platner sat for lengthy interview with antisemitic conspiracy theorist, said he was ‘longtime fan’ of his show

How many do you hit?

What’s your most controversial opinion?

Do you still use compact discs?

A modest proposal

The same people who claimed "Death to Israel" wasn't a call for genocide last week, are now calling for genocide against Israel openly.

What's with users of fediverse using 'Go back to reddit' as a retort to other users?

British planes ‘in the sky’ in Middle East to defend allies after US strikes on Iran

The US is a terrorist state

The same people who claimed "Death to Israel" wasn't a call for genocide last week, are now calling for genocide against Israel openly.

big facts

big facts

You are a mushroom having a human experience

Dunning Kruger Kurtzman Trek

abbreviations - are you addicted yet?

Who is the youngest emacs user?

fin - fish extensible text editor written in fish

Malarchy Masquerades

EXPOSED! How Influencers Get Secretly Paid To Post On Social Media!

not my left

He's nothing without it. [AI/LLM vibe coders]

Didn't you hear me?

StanleyKnife Blade of Freedom & Sheeple Fleecing Shears, Political Compass

Farmers Now Being Forced by Gov't to Poison Their Cows

For when arguments go off the bottom of The Debate Pyramid

fin - fish extensible text editor written in fish