Their class interests align, even if they're not personally Hitlerites their economic dominance was each created by a Hitlerite form of subjugation against the rest of the world

It does seem to like to paste my clipboard which is not very cool, no idea what it's doing with it.

It's actually very common in Chinese apps because before some logic was introduced into android it was the most performant way to transmit states and info between screens. It was common on US apps too, just not when it was obvious that the clipboard was being used. I'm not sure why it's still around, probably just historical tech baggage, alipay, meituan, and WeChat do the same

Marxism prioritizes dialectical analysis over majority opinion

Also what the fuck even is this, this is illegible. Who fucking cares, you clearly don't know what you're talking about; are you saying that your imagined form of analysis you've named dialectical materialism is more meaningful than statistical facts showing widespread approval? That's nakedly really stupid, even if you're clearly an anticommunist it's feeble to try and hide it behind an absurdly thin veneer of Marxism. Just be honest and say you're a liberal, or start engaging with Michael Parenti's work.

Marx differentiates between workers directly managing production and a state acting as their proxy. Material improvements alone don't prove proletarian control

Socialism is not the electrification of Russia

as state capitalism can achieve similar outcomes while concentrating power in a minority.

Yeah, clearly, but you haven't proven it at all. The revolutionary conditions of the PRC have made it so that regular working people can engage with their government in ways impossible in the liberal world, I know from my own experience of being there and from studies like this one from famously CCP Elite backed Harvard which shows that the great masses of people are satisfied in their governance and feel engaged.

You can imply and say all day without evidence that the world's largest socialist country is purely in the hands of a ruling elite which comprises it's own economic class separate from the working class people it represents, but it doesn't make it true.

Honestly real, can't even blame u for that

Am I crazy or are these comments clearly written by AI too lol

Theory? Marxism?

If you engaged with these things in practice and not from a chair you'd understand that something like true education is nonsensical. What defines true education? Marxism is not concerned with that. Marxism is concerned with what's effective at creating a better world, a better people, a better society. Something as abstract as true education has no basis in Materialism because it is an idealistic way to view the world.

I think it's telling that you jump to assumption lumping in the PRC with reactionary states. It's a chauvanistic way to view a very real and flawed but still developing and strengthening socialist project that shines as a beacon of hope in modern history for it's ability to lift more than a billion people out of the most inhuman conditions.

Ultimately only time can tell the effects of this policy, but if hearts and minds are changed towards socialism again it will be because of it's material successes, not the PRC's ability to "brainwash" people.

Damn sometimes I forget how intellectualizing Americans will talk about the largest socialist country on the planet. Literally doing the "at what cost" meme lol

I'll say it, even if what you're saying is true, it's true of all states, and it's good and proper that the PRC reinforces a socialist worldview through it's education. What's the alternative?

Lizard freak

Nothing much hbu

They prioritize those people with connections to various sections of the working class, real workplace and community connections; and they utilize their cadre formations to expand on those connections and make them deeper, so that every member of their party represents many more real members of the community.

Cool desktop, but the term ricing has roots in anti-asian racism, you should change the title or else your post'll probably get taken down

You shouldn't blame yourself or voters in your country. It was the liberal party in the US that failed to garner any support due to it's support of genocide and other factors. These are failings of the political system both countries have inherently that are designed to fail this way, they need to be overthrown and not negotiated with.

I think you raise some interesting points but I think that this just falls back into the failures of prefiguration and expecting resistance and revolution to grow out of an "organic" movement.

If we require prefiguration for our organizational forms, i.e. that we try and create the world that we want in miniature in the organizations we create, then we'll largely fail without a greater strategic basis. This is the thesis of If We Burn by Vincent Bevins, which goes into how these tenets of prefiguration for our organizations lead to them being ultimately too flexible and loose to take hold of national revolutionary crisises which better-led movements are able to take to their advantage.

This just sounds like the age old problem of relying and requiring "organic" growth to happen. It'll happen, it'll get us far, but it has absolutely never been shown on a large national scale to get us far enough to lead to a revolutionary overthrow of society. The party justifies itself by being a conscious organ for working class people to collect knowledge, theory, and practice under one roof which is able to coordinate itself and operate outside the bounds of what would be "organic" or occur naturally otherwise. It doesn't exist at the exclusion of organic left-wing growth, as that's very necessary, but instead represents a section of this organic growth which is then conscious of itself and able to operate outside the bounds previously thought possible.

Am I understanding this all correctly?

I have to say my familiarity with NVNH is very surface level, as in I have no familiarity with it, but this concept of trying to create a "protocol" for safe, effective, and strong communication and cooperation between different people and groups sounds like the purpose of a socialist party. For example, a reason for a socialist party to exist is to give people from these different groups to sit down in one space, talk, compare notes, resolve tensions within working class communities for greater cooperation, etc. Am I wrong in saying that?

Happy individuals can help work towards a revolution, definitely, but two things required for a successful revolution are often horrifying conditions that lead people to want to overthrow the existing order and an organizational framework that allows for the proper decisionmaking to happen necessary for a revolution.

Nah this is nerd shit, it's a basically meaningless role that was just easy to clinch with a couple friends, as much as the ACP is the inheritor of the kind of psy-ops the LaRouchites did back in the day, this is materially still quite meaningless and an indicator of the overall fecklessness of this "organization" and it's lack of real grassroots involvement