Amnesty International is a good start point to evaluate if a government is violent, authoritarian or perpetrating crimes against human rights.

You don't deal with extremists. Dialog only works with who is willing to dialog.

Radicals maybe not wrong about their claimings but are wrong about heir methods.

I replied another comment about enforcing the licenses is not the only thing to consider. Secondary effects like making impossible to sell product to other countries that do respect the license, make it difficult to distribut the software to de "sanctioned" countries and even stop to offer support are some consequences that the community can impose.

A good start to define an authoritarian government is recognizing what Amnesty International says. It is credible.

For a totalitarian government, there is no law enforcement. And I would say that you are absolutely right saying that no license will stop the usage in this case.

But there are other implications that could come from a restrictive licensing like make the distribution hard in that country, make it impossible to sell solutions with unlawful licensing to countries that are not totalitarian, make it hard or impossible to obtain support for that.

But in essence, more than everything, is the open source community sending a clear message that we don't collaborate with monsters.

It is naive to believe that Trump didn't command this himself.

As I said in my comment, I know the logistic problem that Israel is creating for any humanitarian support to reach those people. I also mentioned that my point is: instead of focusing on things that we can't change (like crying on Lemmy), we should focus on what is pragmatic: contribute with resources for those people to receive as much help as possible, as soon as possible. Nothing is easier than have a mobile app where you can directly donate any money that you can.

No, I am not joking. I just prefer to do what I can do, instead of doing nothing or just express my meanless opinion on internet, which will have less than zero positive impact in this situation.

If you choose the political pressure, it is also very helpful. But needs to be expressed through concrete actions in the real world: pressure your representative, protesting in front of government buildings, collaborate with resources to spread the information, etc.

UN has an app called Share the Meal https://sharethemeal.org/ wher you can easily donate to provide food for several places in the world that are in need. It is safe, transparent (show how your money is spent) and allows you to setup a monthly donation. Any value matters a lot.

I know that the major issue today is the logistic because of the monstrosities that Netanyahu government is perpetrating on Palestine people. But we need to focus in what we can do and do our best.

Currently, UN has the best chance to reach those people so, please, let's spread this as much as possible.

What would you expect from President Musk and his craving for rare-earth, and his dog, Donnie T, shaking his tail back to US Oligarchs? Off course Ukraine would be the side loosing everything while Donnie and Vlad would rejoices in more wealth.

I support and share most of your opinions. She is a huge bigot and should be accountable for her actions. My only point is that we have kids and teenagers still consuming her books and products that are completely unaware of what is happening and shouldn't be called out because of that.

My friends, we are watching how US will never be the greates again in anything.

Until Trump comes in their rescue. The loyal dog of Netanyahu.

I think I am old because I liked it a lot and I could see myself using that.

That is the correct answer

Although I think the support to Israel (which I am against too) does not play a role in the sake of this argument, I agree with you: it independent scientists couldn't find scientific evidences to support that, spies are for sure not reliable.