man this is a good linux meme, its funny and its real criticism of linux. why were all the linux memes shitty for a while there? why are they better now suddenly?
i have given up on democrcy, but i havent given up on change...
in particular, it seems to work for whomever can get their districts more successfully gerrymandered.
My ravioli bowl won't unstick. Took about an hour of prying, and still I couldn't unstick the plate.
Could god microwave a ravioli bowl so hot even he couldn't pry the plate off the top?
you dont need to be lecturing on what elbows up means poser
Texas AG Ken Paxton Won’t Face Federal Corruption Charges as He Gains Momentum for Likely Senate Run
usurping the legislature's constitutional power and ignoring the rulings of the judiciary arent allowed in america, but here we are. something something tyrants something something shall not be infringed.
Texas AG Ken Paxton Won’t Face Federal Corruption Charges as He Gains Momentum for Likely Senate Run
Yeah for real. Ever heard of fucking opsec? SMH some people amirite Hominine?
"Taste tests prove these vegan meat brands do not taste as good as the real thing."
It's not required. You have birthright from being born. This question was settled in 1898:
A child born in the United States, ... becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States, by virtue of the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
That 14th amendment is unqualified. The paper is a bureaucratic expediency.
I invite you to try to find case law that reaches the opposite conclusion.
cool great, but those are voluntary processes and the birthright is a right by birth (5head), not by paperwork.
You dodged the actual point tho. people are owed due process and the presumption of innocence and snap jusgements are instead being made on the color of people's skin. And again, that football player they sent to el salvador had a fucking greencard, he was a legal resident.
this isnt nazi germany pal, you dont just go up to people and demand their papers and then send them to a fucking camp whether they have them or not.
idk im at like 7 months an the only time i was able to ctrl f "pedo" in your history was when you were talking about trump (which, fair) and then again about 4chan pedophiles (which, again).
And while I'm at it, suppose someone is born in the US but not in a hospital. They'd have the claim but not the papers to show. Fuck 'em?
We doin law by statistical probability? What are the odds their kid flushed their papers down the toilet that morning. They just SOL?
There's a process for determining citizenship and "that tattooed guy with brown skin looks illegal. Send him to the torture slave camp" aint it champ. He even had his papers. Try again.
I'm sorry, I'm reading back over that message and it came off at least twice as harsh as was intended. My fury should be directed towards others and it accidentally spilled onto you. I came at you a little sideways and I regret the tone.
There is, of course, value in hearing the lies from the horse's mouth
access journalism? where you get some jerk in a chair and lob softballs to retain "access" to them? that thing? thats whats valuable? maintaining access to the people who you know for a fact are lying to you so that you can lob softballs is the valuable thing.
access journalism a bastard child: spawn of the unholy union of the media's profit motive and the accessed's desire to legitimize their message (you are invited to recall the message being legitimized in this case).
the government has means of sending its own messages. uncritical 'stenographizing' of those messages is indistinguishable from endorsement of them. if the media is being pressed into serving as propaganda outlets for the state, that should be the story, not "the white house said..." and clearly they still have some power to say these things remaining because here is tech dirt saying it.
telling someone the weather is dry when its actually wet because you want to deceive them into not carrying an umbrella has negative truth value.
a journalist doesnt prescribe, they describe. they describe the truth (which often includes reporting who is lying about what) as best they can. thats what makes them a journalist instead of an opinion-columnist. they document, record, critically analyze, and publicly journal their findings.
the only thing carrying disinformation-water for a tyrant serves as a "launching point" for is a career in propaganda.
buddy, theres a whole range of ages between 0 and 16, and i use that number 0 advisedly.
Its a fine idea if you assume trump's opinion changes based on what Ukraine says or does. I think trump tends to say or do whatever his goals provoke (whatever those may be) rather than adjusting his opinion to match changing circumstance.
If that's true, then Zelenskyy is making the correct choice assuming trump is already antagonist and anything Ukraine does to apparently provoke him is pretext to further his a priori objective.