Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B

BremboTheFourth

@ BremboTheFourth @piefed.ca

Posts
15
Comments
276
Joined
8 mo. ago

  • Share of newly registered cars that are fully electric

    Jump

  • He didn't create jack shit. He bought into a wave that had already been rising and took all the credit because it was his money funding the ads. But he got involved late and had little to no involvement in design. He was happy to destroy it because he sees more money in cozying up to this administration, getting regulations relaxed, and getting government subsides for his other investments.

    Just don't ever give him credit as a creator of any kind. He wrote some shitty early code for PayPal in the 90s or something. That's the most he's ever "created."

  • Conservatives Escalate False Claims of ‘Trans Violence,’ Declare All Trans People ‘Dangerous and Unstable’ Following News of a Trans Suspect in Deadly Canadian Shooting

    Jump

  • 26 mass shootings at home this year already,, but a trans person in a different country snapped and so that's all they care about. Fucking ghouls. Bring it up to them and they'll probably claim all 26 were false flags carried out by the transgender mafia

  • Anon has a question

    Jump

  • Which raises the question of why it's on the front page here.

  • Scorpions – Coming Home Live

    Jump

  • Is there an artist credit? I can't find one, and this looks an awful lot like it was generated. Claws and stinger are both very unusual, and the claw on the right is strangely mismatched to the left. It even has an extra pincer extending from nowhere.

  • Would the tart blueberries taste as good if you didn't have to randomly power through 3 to 5 bland ones between each good one?

    Jump

  • Obviously you solve this by eating handfuls at a time

  • Photo bomb

    Jump

  • In before y'all are actually baiting me by pretending to be offended by censored swear words. You got me.

    No, it's not just you. I've never seen so many posts get completely wooshed as I have since I started browsing here. I think my most common "type it out then delete it" comment is typing out an explanation of the joke before remembering that whoever misunderstood it in the first place is not likely to react positively to having it explained.

    Also yeah it's wild how every single post with a censored word just gets flooded with self important "you can swear on the Internet" comments. Like... ok. Downvote then fuck off if you're not actually going to engage with the post.

    Honestly I wonder every single day what proportion of posts on this platform are fully automated.

  • Remember_the_tooth explains why you need to wear pajamas

    Jump

  • That type of hardware still would have been owned only by corporations and the absolute wealthiest people, and it certainly wasn't getting wheeled out for home defense.

  • Remember_the_tooth explains why you need to wear pajamas

    Jump

  • Wait, for personal ownership? It's always read to me more as an argument for gun control. Like, "the founding fathers obviously never intended for Joe Shmoe to have serious military hardware, not even in their day, so we should be banning automatic rifles and the like."

  • In a protest against censorship in film, photographer Whitey Schafer staged this iconic photograph in 1934 violating as many rules of the Hayes Code as possible in one shot.

    Jump

  • Tommy gun? I hardly know the gun!

  • Steam Machine and Steam Frame delays are the latest product of the RAM crisis

    Jump

  • Weren't prices already spiking when they made the announcement? Not to mention tariffs change on a daily basis... I was surprised to hear Valve announce new hardware this year at all, less so that it's being delayed. They're either gonna have to walk back their "under $1000" claim, or delay it again. Or just take some losses, they do have the money for it, but I know they won't.

  • Right, Reddit... Riiiight...

    Jump

  • To be fair, as the biggest instance, .world deals with the most bots and spam of any instance. Not surprising whatever countermeasures they've implemented also involve blocking some VPN-associated addresses; they've probably been used by bots before and were blocked due to having been abused, not specifically because they're associated with a VPN.

  • Picked up this brand new TTArtisan 35mm fixed f 1.4 to 16 lens for 15 quid today. Absolutely adore the vintage early 2000s vibe it gives to shots.

    Jump

  • The camera itself looks like it's from the early 2000s, cool buy!

  • one last time

    Jump

  • Must have been, for the doctor want to keep it

  • The DOJ Redacted a Photo of the Mona Lisa in the Epstein Files

    Jump

  • But, like, this one specifically. There are a hundred better examples you could point to for this. Earlier I saw a headline that there are censored random words like "and" or even "I." But claiming they lied about there being a real person's face on there is just self serving.

  • Homeland Security shutdown grows more likely as Republicans rebuff Democrats' ICE demands

    Jump

  • "We can't win an election without winning over this 1/3 that literally never votes for us, so we better piss off the other 2/3 that sometimes do"

  • The DOJ Redacted a Photo of the Mona Lisa in the Epstein Files

    Jump

  • This is just such a weird thing to call out as a lie. Pretty sure you're only doing it so you can validate your snap conclusion. Why would they lie about this? Its not like it makes them look better; pasting some victim's face over a revered piece of artwork so they can pervertedly leer at both simultaneously is not projecting the image they want. Maybe stick to calling out consequential, evident lies.

  • I embody my philosophy.

    Jump

  • I fail to see how these are mutually exclusive

  • Melinda French Gates on Bill Gates in Epstein files - 'Painful times in my marriage'

    Jump

  • She is not a victim. I wouldn't care about her at all outside of "tax her so she's not a billionaire," except this publicity does nothing for anyone but her. Chances are she's paying big bucks to do these interviews. I mean it's the same move her ex has pulled the last 20 years!

    Maybe she was ignorant and had no access to proof. Or maybe she's into the same shit and wants a squeaky clean reputation to help avoid consequences. Either way, these types of articles shouldn't be trusted, and they certainly shouldn't be on the front page.

  • Melinda French Gates on Bill Gates in Epstein files - 'Painful times in my marriage'

    Jump

  • Literally, get a bar of gold, melt it down, press it into gold foil tissues, carve another gold bar into a tissue box, and wipe her tears. She could spend $100,000 on doing that every day for the next 800 years before running out of money.

    Like if she had something genuine to add, that'd be something. You know, corroborate a victim's story, make a call to action, "he should be in prison," even "here's something I'm doing to help" would still be reputation laundering but it would be something. She literally just went on to say (probably lie) that she didn't know about it and it makes her so sad. Fucking billionaires, fuck.