When they say "the 2024 Synology models and older are not affected by this change", it makes me think it's either very recent or still ongoing, as you said.
Par for the course for cm0002 to drop a devisive clickbait "meme" for engagement and disappear. I understand we want Lemmy to grow, but is this actually the kind of content we want churned out?
Clearly they weren't asking that question in good faith, but you countered by cranking the bad faith up to eleven.
I also have concerns with central banks; however, I still appreciate you making this newsworthy OP. Don't stress if everyone doesn't share the same opinions. This would be a boring place if everyone was just reiterating why they agree with each other. ✌️
This is why you shouldn't use complex two-or-more column layouts. Single-column resumes import fine.
Now SI units are getting pegged? When's my turn?
Up about 16% today. During yesterday's earnings report, the board announced that they approved the buying and selling of cryptocurrencies with their $4.7-billion of cash on hand.
Stock up while you can.
This is disgusting. 🤮
Luv you too boo! 😘
Sorry to break it to you, but the OP explicitly states that they believe bins are still inside the cafe. In other comments they also claim they are still available at other nearby parking lots.
The OP also claims there is still trash bins inside; and the edit to add this information was done 1 hour before this guy claims there is no bins inside 🤦♂️.
The OP edited their 5-hour old post about 2 hours ago according to the timestamp. Your comment is only 1 hour old 🤔.
"That cloud looks like a dinosaur to me."
[The cloud wasn't actually a dinosaur. Down vote this punk.]
Not tolerating tankies and not tolerating any dissent are two completely different things. I'm specifically calling out the later. When suggested to add a "no dissent rule", the mod respond that they already had that covered. It sounds like reddit-admin kind of behavior.
Even outside of this specific instance, they're saying any dissenting opinion can result in a ban. If you think it's normal, you can enjoy your echo chambers.
Absolutely, I don't disagree at all. But by claiming to not tolerate any dissenting opinion, you are not "banning authoritarians"; instead, you are becoming the very thing you declared hatred for. I havent seen any evidence that Diva is authoritarian.
Instead, I've seen a mod openly claim that any dissenting opinions would result in a ban; and this would only result in the further developement of an echochamber.
Sure, it's your community, so you ban who you like. You don't need to justify it to me.
I tried steering the conversation back to my actual point, but it seems like all that was ignored. I thought your rule exchange was funny and incredibly ironic. You might enjoy banning any dissenting opinions, but don't be surprised when that earns you an "authoritarian" label.