It's not a counterpoint, but emphasizes an even stronger point. Few Presidents win a majority of those eligible to vote. But to become President without also winning the majority of cast votes is unusual, and it's especially important to emphasize when such a President claims they have a mandate due to being "popular", imo.
which wasn’t the majority, by the way, since not everyone votes
Um, even among the people who cast a vote for President in 2024, Trump didn't get a majority of the votes. He got fewer than half of the Presidential votes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election
I'm on the DOGE team, and those values seem completely accurate and verified to me. /s
Edit: And if they are wrong, by our accounting that means that you just saved the government $399.6 Billion dollars.
Just curious; are you paying the extra toll for advertising-free viewing (on Prime)?
And since it's mentioned in the article, there is a proposed path to having the popular vote decide the presidency that doesn't require a constitutional amendment, and IMO it's surprisingly further along than one might guess: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact
Do I count MacOS users in that search?
What's being discussed for Reagan is the " October Surprise" (not Iran-Contra, a different scandal).