i can see that there is something interesting going on in the background. this is funny, because it is as if it were the focus compared to the relatively mundane talk in the foreground.
is... this ai?
do you think someone just actually whipped up a 3d model just for a meme?
no.
i should take time off news. it took me reading "home Depot" to figure out this was not in fact real
you should be a CEO
lemmy users really cannot contain themselves when a swear word is censored. i wouldn't be surprised if the censor is part of the meme.
we do have time magic rocks, bring in the quartz.
Congrats for getting hit! /j of course
I've found that whether barilla is precise or not changes geographically. it still is not a great brand, not even for budget.
MANKIND IS DEAD
she even has the bass face hell yeah
don't step on the blåhaj :<
this is a common fallacy with religion, but basically it's not that religion has aided studies, but rather studies have made it despite religion. just because it happened under religion doesn't mean religion is what helped it.
"x is cheap" is not the greatest take imo. it's cheap until you just so happen to not be able to afford it. what now? better give me an income for the price in storage. not talking about flatpak specifically.
I'm sure one would have a better idea than you whether they're trans or not regardless of clothing.
yee haw 🤠
you might wanna mark this nsfw
what in unholiness
i used powershell, and even after trying every other shell and as a die hard Linux user I've considered going back to powershell cause damn man
Between Linux or Windows which do you think will be first to have a viable OS for quantum computers?
To add to what most people are saying here, i also believe that quantum computing will evolve rapidly one day, with new algorithms being developed there is no telling if quantum computing will truly stay niche or specialized and can't be expanded into general purpose computing. as tech is always evolving, i would argue that claiming that quantum processors stay akin to gpu's. gpu's are pretty much a sprecialization of the same stuff that builds a cpu, to my understanding. therefore, there is nothing truly proving that qpu's can't just evolve backwards into a parallel to cpu's. besides, i can see it being favorable to keep only a qpu for most desktop platforms and only optionally a cpu that would be plugged into the equivalent of a pcie slot. that's far fetched, but i also don't think it's too unreasonable.