Baltic states are getting more and more attention in global press; Europe seems to be waking up - finally - to all the warnings that had been sent over the last few decades.
An interesting read. I don't fully agree with the following statement:
And like the proverbial lunatic who tries the same thing over and over thinking he might get a different result, U.S. policymakers never seem to learn the right lessons, he argued.
The context here is all the attempts at regime change in the Middle East. I think there's a good chance the regime was just an excuse enabling the military industry to keep moving forward.
This feels sensible. There will always be naysayers, there will always be exports to poorer countries, but arguing against such a policy makes it sound like protecting the status quo for the sake of it.
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres invoked a rarely exercised power to warn the Security Council of an impending “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza.
I do wish EC pulls this off. It would great having an actual home-grown competitor to cloud providers. EU does data protection better than anyone else, this would very much be a symbiotic relationship.
"Seldom is so ambitious a case filed on so slight a basis," wrote Circuit Judge Raymond Kethledge, noting there are thousands of companies that have manufactured PFAS but just 10 listed as defendants in the case.
How on earth did that happen? It's such a disappointment, but at the same time I understand the judicial system has to follow the law and apply it equally.
Why was the lawsuit so limited in the first place?
Normally I prefer specialization, but these industries are massive enough to still have economy of scale benefits even after duplicating efforts across continents.
It's probably also a nice boost to local economies.