Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L

logging_strict

@ logging_strict @programming.dev

Posts
7
Comments
319
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • Taking your situation. Could make an argument, but this illustration is more convincing.

    I'm living in a society that doesn't have that custom. i'm from a society that does. When they see the guy twice their size, sometimes not always, they somehow recall that's a custom.

    This custom is a litmus test for how much a person can perceive beyond their own self. Some people are incapable of empathy or seek out applying lose-win situations.

    I have a good idea. Don't fail at this custom. For those who really lack empathy they should be even more proactive as to fake it convincingly.

    Choose your battles. This one is most definitely not worth fighting.

    You want me to bow so you can live out your princess fantasies? np

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • Whatever law is written can be challenged in court.

    If the victim believes strongly enough and believes justice cannot be gleaned from the current society, he may not base his reactions or future actions based on legal or illegal.

    A certain percentage of society will just go into video game mode. We see this over and over again.

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • legal illegal argument is weak. If you present a strong argument that is ignored and feel strongly justice was denied and decide to luigi your oppressors, laws have changed for less.

    It takes one guy ... one

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • pfft Canadian. Your jumping to conclusions based on projection is what would expect from a people who were surprised that using GoFundMe during protests might not end well.

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • i disagree with your sexual fixation on tiny LEDs. That was a dangerous situation warranting mitigation strategies including video recording.

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • as it should be when going into a known dangerous situation.

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • What part? not having trial by jury

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • i agree.

    The guy was acting as a citizen journalist. And he reacted like someone that lucked into a story. It's a non-negligible risk that violence will occur on the subway in a lawless sanctuary state run by despots and inhabited by Karens and the third world. So wearing surveillance glasses is completely warranted in this situation.

    Maybe he identified the threat? Turns out he was right. What if it turns out the footage is him doing risk assessment?

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • thank you. I made the edits

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • Fixable by constant streaming to cloud. Which would be a needed feature for those at protests where it's expected to encounter censorship by the State. One step beyond that is the relay off mesh network until reach a few nodes with web connections.

    The guy likes collecting evidence. Both against himself and others. Discovery is a bitch.

    An unprovoked attack is an unprovoked attack. In this case, the guy choose not to beat her senseless. How kind of him. That's a gambling women. People laugh cuz she got away with it. And after losing a few teeth they'd react to that too. Some would laugh even harder. At which point who's the hero?

    The woman, the man, or the guys laughing even harder?

    Someone comes up to me and breaks my reading glasses or laptop, i'm gonna be thinking which arm was used? OK that is the arm i break. i'm a coder FAFO

    Disclosure: in the subway a Japanese guy, no provocation, intentionally kicked my shin hard. Oh that's interesting, i've never been kicked by a chihuahua (i'm twice his size). Lets see how this plays out. So i choose to stand directly in front of him. And he continued to kick my shin and i continued to ignore the pain. Pain is temporary and it's also a choice. i'm not Christian, so turn the other cheek is a foreign concept. I deemed him too small to bother with. He had no where to retreat to. I'm leering over him, he's sitting. I could use overhead metal railing to brace against while kicking his head in. He was in a disadvantaged defensive position. I choose to pick my battles. To my knowledge to this day he doesn't have to eat thru a straw.

    If at the time, had laptop and instead he kicked the laptop, that might have swayed me to take that challenge. Beating up a chihuahua is beneath me, but someone attacking my livelihood maybe needs to learn a lesson. In which case it's not violence, it's a teaching moment.

    Now wear reading glasses. Breaking those glasses prevents me from coding. As does breaking the laptop.

    My point is the risk she took was real. It was a dumb move unless her intent was to become a statistic. Celebrating a dumb move or crime is expected from legacy media and morons.

    I've trained myself not to laugh or take pleasure from other people's pain or discomfort. See it as an indication of NPC.

  • The Rise and Rise of FastAPI (mini documentary)

    Jump

  • This forum is neither youtube nor twitter. Transcript plz.

    The OP marked this post as being in English, the summary is showing German, if it is in German, that's ok, run it through a translator software and promise not to complain about the grammar.

    I'm a coder, i deal solely in text. Know your market or ignore a portion of your market, in which case you will from now on be known as Hillary Clinton. She lost by alienating 50% of the planet. Which was a very bold move that obviously didn't pan out well.

    If desire to transfer the authoritarian oppression to federated lemmy, feel free to translate the ads as well ;-) Or for shits and giggles, make up fictitious ad.

    If it's entertaining enough, might be distracted from staring at all those languishing PRs in both fastapi and sqlmodel.

  • Django 6.0 released

    Jump

  • Wondering how it's implemented. As a Message Queue e.g. RabbitMQ/celery?

  • Sovereign Tech Agency and PSF Security Partnership

    Jump

  • This article is actually a little interesting, lets recall PSF recently rejected being funded by US govt.

    Two seconds later, Germany no problem.

    Hmmm ...

  • Mistake with swallowing EnvironmentError errors in Django application

    Jump

  • How old is this article? There hasn't been EnvironmentError since py33

    Had to look it up.

    Your point still stands, ignoring Exceptions bad. The next thing would wanna see are the unit tests. If those are nonexistent then of course the code is gonna be buggy. The hint is that you called the CLI a script. So not a package.

    So it's a good thing you have revisited the code and hopefully rewritten it as a package with a test suite.

  • Python steering council accepts lazy imports

    Jump

  • This is the kinda news want to wake up in the morning and be presented with.

  • The PSF has withdrawn a $1.5 million proposal to US government grant program

    Jump

  • We don't need to agree these are DEI policies. This is a risk vs reward issue. So comes down to the simple question of, where does PSF derive it's funding.

    If PSF feels it's funding is sufficient, then it's safer to not take the funding. Pursuing the funding in the first place therefore must have been a easily foreseeable mistake.

    The West however is in a hyper-inflationary or at least inflationary situation. So PSF traditional base will face financial pressure.

    May have the luxury now to turn down the funding, but sit back and buckle in as the US and EU moves the dial way up to, hold my beer. During that period, securing funding may become super difficult.

  • The PSF has withdrawn a $1.5 million proposal to US government grant program

    Jump

  • Thank you Thank you Thank you for listing the PSF activities that the PSF feels might violate current administrations executive order (EO) concerning DEI.

    Can completely rule out these as non-issues:

    • travel grants for the conferences
    • encourages local chapters (THIS IS NOT DEI)

    None of these PSF activities run afoul of the EO.

    Would like to add this as also a non-issue:

    • the two year claw back period (just hold the funds for two years)

    As long as the PSF doesn't go out of their way to ensure the code of conduct (1) or their operations or at conferences (2) are explicitly geared towards promoting DEI policies.

    PSF is concerned, correct me if i'm mistaken, so this most likely is the source of their concerns. Increasingly seems like self-inflicted tempest in a tea cup or purposefully shooting themselves in the foot.

  • The PSF has withdrawn a $1.5 million proposal to US government grant program

    Jump

  • This is my stance. You are welcome to argue points, but gaslighting is not an argument. And only white people are gaslighted for tribalism, but its ok for everyone else to use identity politics in favor of their tribe.

    If there are other real causes then list them. By presenting an actual argument i might be in danger of learning something.

    You are showing a pattern of using psyche, especially reframing with gamed terminology (anti-inclusion), which then i counter by using the opposite terminology (anti-white). We could play this game from now 'til the end of eternity. This psyche back and forth however is not presenting an actual argument.

    And in case you lack situational/contextual awareness, we are in a programming forum. Not being able to string together a coherent or convincing argument will make world+dog wonder whether you are lost.

    Expect more from my peers. Stop toying with me and win the argument already. The barrier is not high.