I don't think anyone will be held to account, so no one who needs to learn anything will. The same decision makers who took us down this path will keep being decision makers.
In absolute time spent, driving 20mph instead of 45mph for a few minutes is rather small. But people lose their mind, and don't care if it means putting kids in danger. People don't think like that.
I think the problem isn't so much the signage and limits as it is we built roads that encourage driving unsafe speeds. That and we built a world where everyone driving their own private vehicle is normal, and often the only practical option. But changing all of that is a lot harder than lowering speed limits.
On the one hand, you don't really want to give people the power to decide what books are available. Assholes would use that to remove queer books, for example.
On the other hand, that power is already implicitly in place. There's finite space in a library, so they must choose a subset of all possible books. I'd want to know how the existing processes work before suggesting changes.
Well, we were literally walking in Manhattan when it came up, and couldn't take the euclidean straight path. We could only walk on the grid of streets.
(This is setting aside factors like waiting to cross, or a busier street)
Interesting. The inability to pan and walk around makes it very different. I liked "walking" around in geoguesser until I found a landmark or something, but I never played competitively or obsessively.
I worked in a grocery store that had a little pizza making section. End of the day they'd throw out a lot of pizza. Management absolutely did not want employees to grab some at the end of the day.
Well, I was friends with the guy who worked there so he'd "throw it out" into my possession. I had a lot of free pizza back then.
Nowadays there's an app "too good to go" where you can get cheap food at the end of the day from places. Not as good as free, but like four slices of pizza for $5 isn't bad.
I'm the kind of guy who will look stuff up. I think it's really important to admit when you're wrong and the other person was right. Don't move goal posts or claim you misunderstood. Just own it.
Like I was having a debate with my partner about if it was faster to go all the way up and over, or make a lot of turn-right then turn-left. I thought the ladder was faster because it approximates a straight line. She was like no that's crazy. Eventually I found that's called Manhattan distance and she was right, and I fully admitted defeat.
As others have said, working from home has many benefits
no commute
save time
save money
less risk of disease and accident
often easier child care options
greater control over environment
offices are often too hot or cold for some
stock own food, drinks, toilet paper, etc
better pet access. Cat on lap. Dog walk easier.
easier wardrobe
several distraction categories removed
people walking up to your desk
loud meetings
The commute alone is pretty big. If your commute is like an hour, that's changing your salary from like $x / 10 hours to $x / 8 hours. That's a big bump. If your daily pay was $1000, that's like going from $100/hour to $125/hour.
I realized when reading one of the other comments that my similarly sized complaint is it creates a lot of potential for problems at the game level as well as narrative when people make their characters in isolation. I kind of assumed that comes packaged with "and you all meet in a tavern".
Like, everyone makes a fighter and shows up to session 1. The dm's going to have a head scratcher thinking about balance, and some players might be annoyed they don't really have a niche of their own. A weird party like that can work, but it'll be a happier experience if folks talk about it ahead of time.
It can work, as clearly shown by your rather wholesome example and many people's games. But it's also leaving a very large surface area for problems. Unlike real life, you can just avoid that by making your characters together.
Maybe I should have said in my previous thread that while the "you all meet for the first time" is kind of cliché, there are more serious problems at the game level. And like it can work if everyone makes a fighter, but you can also make everyone's lives easier if you discuss up front.
They don't care about the snow. They care about getting people mad at their enemy. The post, and conservatives more generally, are bad,. dishonest, people.
I don't think anyone will be held to account, so no one who needs to learn anything will. The same decision makers who took us down this path will keep being decision makers.