Hold on, so now you want to use USB C for data transfer?
Sure, why not? My headphones have a built-in MP3 player which I can load up with 32GB of music. Flash memory is tiny and cheap - why shouldn't my watch have my music collection on it? Is grabbing a CSV of my data via USB easier than trying to send it via BT? Might be. Let's find out.
Because again, ALL smartwatches need more battery than they currently have.
For you, maybe. This £16 one has lasted nearly 5 days of doing continual heart monitoring and is still on 40% battery. Even better, I don't need to take it off if I want to charge it. Weekly charging is better than my phone or laptop.
I slightly disagree with you about the screen needing to be always on. I'm not always looking at my watch, so it might as well save battery where it can. I don't leave my laptop screen on when I walk away from it, and that has a much bigger battery.
weird hardware is weird and weird is fun.
On that we can agree! This is a fun experiment.
You need a solution that fits all cases with near-optimal performance.
I disagree. I think it is OK to have some choice in the market. Some people will prefer magnetic wireless, some wired, some plutonium batteries.
and if anything focusing on it distracts from the very real need to come to a proper standard in this space, which I find somewhat annoying.
Like, mate, I don't have the power to enact anything. I'm just one guy blogging. I'm not involved in the design, manufacture, or standardisation of anything watch related. I don't understand why you're getting annoyed by me talking about it though.
In which case, you might like the eInk screen on the Watchy. I reviewed it at https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2023/06/review-watchy-an-eink-watch-full-of-interesting-compromises/
Screen is always on but eInk gives it great battery life. Although the rest of the watch is even more experimental than the USB-C one 😆