Yeah, I think this is the best option. It sounds a little weird at first, because we're so used to hearing it the other way around, but it makes more sense if you think about it.

Some computer nerd friends and I came up with a solution for this:

Computer architectures typically provide separate instructions for "logical" and "arithmetic" bit-shifts. The details as to why aren't important, but we can borrow the nomenclature.

When referring to "tomorrow" in the sense of "when I wake up from my next sleep cycle", use "logical tomorrow". When referring to "tomorrow" in the sense of "after midnight tonight", use "arithmetic tomorrow" (or "chronological tomorrow", if you really want to be pedantic).

Amazing game, one of my all-time faves.

If you're not into hiding/running from monsters, there's an option to turn enemy aggression off so you can just play through the story, which is the real gem.

Bunny owner here, I can answer this!

Rabbits produce two kinds of feces: normal "waste" feces and edible "cecotropes" or "cecal pellets". They generally eat the cecotropes immediately after excreting them, and only drop the waste into their litterboxes.

Only NOW?

As an engineer, Sai, Master Thopterist's flavor text really speaks to me: "Industry without artistry is just another way to fill a junkyard."

More people need to learn to use Rational types. A pretty large majority of the numbers that people care about in real life can easily be represented by a ratio of integers, and they allow math with perfect precision.

Sigh. Guess I need the joke explained?

What's wrong with strict types?

Fuck ChatGPT.

tl;dr tl;dr: use a modern compiler.

Can we just not with the AI-generated illustrations?

ArsTechnica, baby

I know they're owned by Condé Nast, but they seem to genuinely maintain a good deal of journalistic independence

I love the idea that Chrysalis and Celestia got together because they're the only ones big enough to cuddle properly.

I seem to recall coming across a glossary that had something to the effect of,

mutual recursion - see recursion, mutual

recursion, mutual - see mutual recursion

What a coincidence, I just filled the washer fluid on mine!

Quick plug (heh) for electric cars - that's about the only maintenance they need.

Yep, checks out to me.

I mean, I'm not really shocked. If you've ever seen bald eagles in the wild, they behave more like overgrown seagulls than the dignified predators you've been conditioned to expect - they even sound ridiculous.

Canada geese, though? They'll straight up fuck you up.

The fact that someone else fixed the issue doesn't really excuse the absolutely unacceptable original response to a very reasonable request.

I'm much more interested in seeing an apology, or any sort of indication that the dev understands how disrespectful they were.

Would be cooler if it were 100%, but I'll take it.