Ineffably awesome work! Thank you very much! ✨The hair, shadows, and eyes ideas are very interesting, too! The indescribable eyes felt like sharing a reflection, and the reflection reminded me of the following personal screenshot I have in backups, from Mirror's Edge Catalyst:
I see, thank you for confirming your true intentions...Sorry, but you won't receive any response from my end from this point.Regardless, please do stay safe!
No, I would never call them the ineffably sorrowfull and historically awfull term you chose, and I do ask you to not, too.
These people protected, saved lives of non-binary people, and served them multiple times. And not to mention non-recorded cases, that inherit and supported other numerous people they rescued, saved, and served.
Please do consider people in military forces who put their lives back to back in the fields, and face the true agony, hate, and sorrow.
Thank you very much! The red dot is likely smaller...Though, I don't appreciate nor agree with the bomb part! ^^The work reminded me of the following paper:
Many unresolved legal questions over LLMs and copyright center on memorization: whether specific training data have been encoded in the model’s weights during training, and whether those memorized data can be extracted in the model’s outputs.
While many believe that LLMs do not memorize much of their training data, recent work shows that substantial amounts of copyrighted text can be extracted from open-weight models...
We investigate this question using a two-phase procedure: (1) an initial probe to test for extraction feasibility, which sometimes uses a Best-of-N (BoN) jailbreak, followed by (2) iterative continuation prompts to attempt to extract the book.
We evaluate our procedure on four production LLMs: Claude 3.7 Sonnet, GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Grok 3, and we measure extraction success with a score computed from a block-based approximation of longest common substring...
Taken together, our work highlights that, even with model- and system-level safeguards,
extraction of (in-copyright) training data remains a risk for production LLMs...
I am sorry, but I believe these "stolen" cases, piracy, unaccountability, and disrespect towards artists and history in general... did indeed greatly support the "world disorders" of the current state of events...
Why not share the reference to the original post and author?Thankfully, you at least did not remove the sign of the artist in the corner...
Have you considered a supportive device for the works or conceptual ideas, like a general tablet (e.g. a great one I had a chance to use for drawings was Xiaomi Pro 7 with its official stylus and case with trackpad), or an actual drawing tablet like Wacom, the vendor (e.g. Wacom One new version)?These supported me in addition to the always ineffably magnificent and charming wooden pencils and oil, too!
No, sorry. Never. I believe in mind training and development, human discussions, attribution, contribution, and discoveries for human work, imagination, achievements, and scientific miracles.
I am sorry... In this case, I come from military and engineering fields, and these are quite genius people in field operations, hardware, programming, security, and the most have children, and that's probably why...
They just believe those who are into these "minorities" are eventually left without children, and leave their parents without grandchildren, their whole family root stops, permanently... And the most would start discussing how damaging that propaganda is to decrease the birth rate... and would focus on that instead of the actual artwork...
In other words, I just expressed the thought I had regarding the presence of a "sticker for a value" that does indeed affect the auditory much. The lack of it would probably allow the work to be expressed in more environments and lives of people out there, in more safe manner, but its up to the talented and quite genius artist! ✨
Thank you! I do like the dithering, colors, radical layout, a likely manual font, and overall pace of the great, priceless work...
Regarding the "value" mentioned, indeed... I am sorry, and I would also send a link to some friends I know, who love pixel-art, Debian, and ThinkPads, some of them have multiple models of IBM logo era, but that "sticker" is what will cause them upset, I believe. They would consider it an instant "propaganda" for "childless, infertile, and disgust" and that "redundancy" would "devalue" the whole work for them, it feels like...
Meanwhile, may I ask, what is the actual book? It seems as something about "radiation" or "radiolocation" etc. "operation... manual"...
The advantages of Bazzite Desktop Edition include: being developed by technical experts from renowned companies such as Microsoft, Ubuntu, Intel, Amazon, and Red Hat. It supports not only AMD and NVIDIA graphics cards but also Intel ARC+. With its Cloud Native architecture, even if updates cause software package corruption, users can roll back to any Bazzite version released within the past 90 days.Source
After that, the website presents a screenshot (not HTML) of Bazzite Linux distribution contributors, though the first expression it raised is that these contributors are of this device and not the distribution ^^"
I am not sure how an app crashing is related to a certain Lemmy Community, but just in case there's a marvelous Thunder (source) that is working like a charm ✨
Great choice! You may find the following device also interesting!: Mecha Comet 🪐