I don’t disagree with this mindset, but I do want to say that it should be on the plaintiff to prove your child caused the problem rather than the defendant to prove they did not. Proving a negative is damn near impossible in court.
If your choices raise everyone else’s risk, it’s fair that you carry some of the burden. Courts deal in probability every day.
Because when everyone’s broke, the whole social network changes. People stop pretending the system works for them and start relying on each other instead.
If your choices raise everyone else’s risk, it’s fair that you carry some of the burden. Courts deal in probability every day.