Can we try a different example or a declarative statement that negates my implied claim that in any case where a thing is unused, it must be categorized as waste by definition? The previous questions seem obviously clarifying of nothing. I know they're probably clarifying once your point is known, but because the point remains unknown to me, I can only perceive them as empty Socratic dialogue? I know it's not, I'm just trying to express more definitively how confused I'm getting lol
I love that your comment is getting downvoted with 0 replies addressing what you highlighted here. There's a flood of memes pinpointing much more serious similarities (ice/gestapo, fake news/Lügenpress, etc.) but now we are so in love with our passive resentment of the situation that we're pretending both leaders having a face is indicative of sameness
I read this same principle in an arch or gentoo forum/manual. I can't even think of an argument against it tho? Unused anything is wasted by definition isn't it? I know I'm missing something obvious somehow
Great post. I have been wondering for awhile how those of us who understand the importance of all this can best organize and ensure growth towards a movement. What reliable orgs are honestly at the front, helping get the word out about these interconnected issues?
I'm confused, why did you halt wikipedia writing and move on to wikimedia/longevity orgs(What are these?)? I'm also curious to see if you could expound on that last part too please
what universe am I in now, then? Schools ARE government buildings on my planet lol