Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
20
Comments
74
Joined
3 mo. ago

  • 34 (mainly non–core Anglosphere newspapers) of the 121 platforms TWL can give you access to require an application. The rest you can access automatically, instantaneously right now as long as you meet the stats.

    I mentioned that this (only) solves one (of two) major problems archive.today was used to solve: paywalls. This is also very workable; you already have major newspapers like Haaretz and WSJ available on TWL.

    I also mentioned that the backcatalogue problem can be solved by running a different archiving service on the existing archive.today URLs we use.

  • I am an active editor lol. I'm saying that the proposal is to establish something similar to TWL for media URLs. It would serve the same purpose for editors as a major complaint in the discussion was over addition of Archive.today links to bypass paywalls. Obviously developing this deal would take a lot of work but it is workable.

    You must first apply to gain access.

    That's not true. Anyone who meets the stats you mentioned may access TWL.

    the WML does not host any of these publications

    Indeed, that's what makes it legally sound and prevents us from needing to relicense. We don't need to license the content to copyleft for the thing to work.

  • Archived pages wouldn't necessarily be the knowledge they distribute, just ways to verify the knowledge they distribute is correct. Content from The Wikipedia Library (which provides access to academia) isn't relicensed at all, for example. Such a service would be a project but not a sister project like Wikisource is,

  • No, you do not need real time chat, you need searchable, permanent presence

    why not both? Discourse is really nice but it's a forum, not IRC or Matrix

  • I disagree, but we'll see what they do with it

  • Server owners must apply an age-restricted label to any channels that contain sexually explicit content involving adults or content involving adults that is shared solely for the purposes of sexual gratification.

    nothing else needs to be age-restricted, and age restriction of topics you mentioned would be big news for discord. pluralkit's home is discord and has great influence there, and the lgbtq+ community definitely has a larger presence than the plural community

  • only changes for the unverified:

    • Channels, servers, and commands set to age-restricted will be inaccessible
    • DM requests deemed "sensitive" will be inaccessible
    • "Sensitive content" will be blurred
    • Won't be able to become a speaker in "stage" channels, a special type where a few videoconferencers have a meeting where anyone else can watch and type but not videoconference; verified watchers can be invited to speak
    • DMs from unfamiliar users will be routed to a separate "warning"

    nothing else

    I think this is business as usual...

  • ruling that California’s new law was unconstitutional because it did not impose the same requirements on all federal, state and local law enforcement officers.

    However, the judge allowed the state to enforce a separate law that requires all law enforcement officers, including federal ones, to display visible identification.

  • that's more than one bit, though, which is part of the question's constraints. In practice that means [No response] would be the same as indicating 0 or even 1 and they cannot convey additional information by controlling for time of receipt, likely because they can't control time of receipt

  • people who are doxxed have different experiences

  • a lot of people treat social media as their journal, a one and done thing, and only want to hit the save button once

  • i agree, but that would still be more clicks, and research often stresses how people can't be bothered to make that one extra click

  • Just copy post to multiple sites

    that's a lot of effort

  • why, the hilllls are alive

  • There is nominator criteria; The Nation is claiming they have eligibility through relations with past Nobel (Peace) laureates, who are eligible.

  • I'd say it's not an ESL problem so much as a "common swift not endangered nor news here" problem.