Skip Navigation

Search

Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
Encryption @feddit.ch
  • European Court of Human Rights declares backdoored encryption is illegal

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/11992277

European Court of Human Rights declares backdoored encryption is illegal::Surprising third-act twist as Russian case means more freedom for all

Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
freedomPusher @sopuli.xyz

(poll) Are DPAs getting you justice under the GDPR?

blobfox.coffee armchairFossarian (@[email protected])

How is the #GDPR serving you? Have you filed complaints to any Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in #Europe? #poll #EU #GDPRart97 [ ] I have never filed a GDPR art.77 complaint (I have no EU activity) [ ] I have never filed a GDPR art.77 complaint yet I have EU transactions [ ] All my art.77 c...

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/8481789

#poll

Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
soloActivist @links.hackliberty.org

(GDPR) Data controller refuses to honor requests unless an ID card is supplied - IN COLOR

cross-posted from: https://links.hackliberty.org/post/435505

A data controller responded to a #GDPR request under art.15 & 17 (thus, an access request coupled with erasure request). They responded with a refusal, demanding ID card. They probably demanded it be in color, but I responded with a black and white copy of my ID. They refused again, affirming that the ID card must be in color. So then I sent them a color copy, but I used black boxes to redact my facial image and all personal text except my name. They again refused to honor my request, saying “zonder vlekken en met een goede resolutie om te worden geaccepteerd”. That translates into “without spots or stains”, correct? I don’t think that means without redactions.

Anyway, I would like a GDPR expert to confirm or deny whether the controller’s refusal and demands are lawful.

The relevant GDPR text is:

M

Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
Encryption @feddit.ch
  • Europe prepares to break browser security with eIDAS 2.0
Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
Encryption @feddit.ch
  • Rights advocates back surveillance tech bans in EU
Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
Encryption @feddit.ch
  • Big Tech braces for EU Digital Services Act regulations
Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
Encryption @feddit.ch
  • TikTok to face EU fine over processing of children’s data
Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
Encryption @feddit.ch
  • Privacy group challenges Ryanair's use of facial recognition
Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
Encryption @feddit.ch
  • Meta's Rush to Topple Twitter Sets Up Looming Privacy Debate

Meta is one of the biggest privacy offenders,, not suprising that they already seem to break EU privacy law.

Some section sof the article:

Upcoming data privacy regulations are preventing Meta's new microblogging app "Threads" from launching in European Union (EU) markets. Experts say this is only the beginning of the privacy battle facing the Twitter clone.

Judging by its entry in the Apple app store, it's no wonder that Threads is being shielded from EU scrutiny. Browsing history, geolocations, health and financial information, and much more are all up for grabs. There's even a dedicated category for "sensitive information" which, according to Apple's documentation, includes "racial or ethnic data, sexual orientation, pregnancy or childbirth information, disability, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, political opinion, genetic information, or biometric data."

Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
Encryption @feddit.ch
  • Meta loses as top EU court backs antitrust regulators over privacy breach checks
Fight For Privacy @feddit.ch
Encryption @feddit.ch
  • DSA Must Follow a Human-Rights Centered Enforcement Process, With Regulators Engaging International Civil Society Voices