"please leave my party (I have set up a bunch of party supplies by the door you can take to host your own party)" is... not... authoritarian?

It's a political movement

You're right, being against fascism isn't 'too much politics'. However, "This is an antifa instance" being the first thing on the front page of the instance certainly is. It shows that the admin's political stance is important enough to them that it's the first thing they want everyone seeing. Between this, the AMA on reddit, and across the instances, the dev's political leanings seem to be inserted wherever and whenever possible.

Nothing's wrong with politics. Hell, I even share very similar views to those here, I just think that kind of discussion is better suited to a politics-based community, and not as multiple posts plastered on the front page.

Did you reply to the wrong guy, because he didn't say or even remotely imply that being against racism is a controversial stance.

I can't see which post you're replying to. These thread lines are an optical illusion.

Antifa's method of activism is controversial

While there is nothing controversial about being anti-racist, Antifa is not simply anti-racist. It's the style of activism that's controversial. From wikipedia:

Antifa is an anti-fascist political movement in the United States[2][3][4][5] comprising a diverse[6][7] array of autonomous groups that aim to achieve their objectives through the use of both non-violent and violent direct action rather than through policy reform.[8][9][10][11] Antifa political activists engage in protest tactics such as digital activism and militancy,[11][12] sometimes involving property damage, physical violence and harassment, against fascists, racists and the far-right

Petitioning for policy reform is relatively non-controversial. But that's not Antifa. Obviously some of the more extreme actions (e.g. violence and property destruction) are controversial - and Antifa is open to them.

Antifa's ideology is controversial

Components of Antifa ideology:

• anti-racism (non-controversial of course)
• anti-capitalism (obviously controversial and IMO unpopular)
• anarchy (obviously controversial and IMO unpopular)

I can't even get my head around how it's possible to be both anti-capitalist and anarchist at the same time. Anarchy is also favored by the extreme right, and obviously anarchy is a recipe for pure uncontrolled capitalism -- most oppressive form of capitalism. What am I missing?

Lemmy censorship

In the case of lemmy.ml leadership, what we see is extreme censorship. We're not just talking censorship of trashy messages. I recently posted a thread on the status of the cock.li email servers, and it was censored because the word "cock" appeared in the domain name. (proof). Obviously it's essential to mention the domain name of the service we're talking about.

No one will care if racist msgs get censored, but any post that's incompatible with an anti-capitalist or anti-government viewpoint is also likely to be censored when you see how fast and loose they are with the censor trigger.

So am I racist because I'm not an antifa nor a fascist? Do I need to be an antifa to be anti-racist?

welcome :D

This kind of stuff is why some people left reddit.

So is being anti-communist just as bad as being a communist? How deep does the rabbit hole go?