Iowa Supreme Court will decide if Libertarian hopefuls get on congressional ballot
A District Court Judge upheld a state panel’s ruling that would remove 3 Libertarian candidates for U.S. House from Iowa’s ballots; the Supreme Court will hear the Libertarians’ appeal.
You're viewing a single thread.
I wish the right-wing spoiler candidate the very best o7
Spoiler candidates for the Repubs sure are ok, right?
Not fair if it's a spoiler candidate for the Dems tho, right?!
Not a question of fairness for me. It's a question of if it's more likely to bring good things or bad things. Spoiler for repugs = good. Spoiler for dems = bad.
Not a question of fairness for me. It’s a question of if it’s more likely to bring good things or bad things. Spoiler for repugs = good. Spoiler for dems = bad.
So it's only unfair when it happens to democrats. But totally fair when it happens to republicans?
What do you think of the Green Party and the Socialist parties?
I never said anything about fairness. You keep fixating on it.
US electoral politics have nothing to do with fairness. They are downright anti-democratic. Gotta play the game and make as few tactical mistakes (like voting for Grifting Jill) as possible.
I support actual left-wing parties when they're viable, but Jill Stein and Cornell West need to fuck right out of presidential elections and end their grift. The Greens and other third-parties that run in other elections they can actually win have my support and my vote.
US electoral politics have nothing to do with fairness. They are downright anti-democratic.
Agreed.
So anyway, god bless Chase Oliver, Jo Jorgensen, Gary Johnson, Ron Paul, and all other right-wing spoiler candidates. We thank you for your service o7o7o7
Also, we had this exact same conversation a few weeks ago, and it's ...interesting... that it followed the exact same dialogue tree and not at all suspicious of the integrity of your account... 🤔
Also, we had this exact same conversation a few weeks ago,
And I haven't changed my mind. That's not "suspicious," that's me not changing my mind.
You haven't changed your mind, does that mean your account is suddenly "suspicious"?
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
So your big argument is "you people care about some things and not others!"